I-26 and suburban sprawl

Post Reply
User avatar
bannination
Captain
Posts: 4474
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: I-26 and suburban sprawl

Unread post by bannination » Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:22 pm

Heck, if they'd just enforce the slower traffic keep right law the problem would solve itself.

User avatar
O Really
Captain
Posts: 10058
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: I-26 and suburban sprawl

Unread post by O Really » Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:30 pm

Vrede wrote:When going that way I take 191 or 25 at times that I-26 is likely to be slow. I always get to A'ville or back within 10 minutes or less of the time it takes when I-26 is clear.
Widening a road never ends congestion, it just lets more cars be congested. The only solution to congestion is more alternate routes.

User avatar
O Really
Captain
Posts: 10058
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: I-26 and suburban sprawl

Unread post by O Really » Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:00 pm

Vrede wrote:Or, a comprehensive land use and transportation plan to reduce single occupancy vehicle travel.

Better now, when the next oil crisis or price leap hits will be too late.
Well, yes, "alternate routes" would include bus, light rail, etc.

Supsalemgr
Major
Posts: 537
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: I-26 and suburban sprawl

Unread post by Supsalemgr » Sat Feb 02, 2013 7:45 am

Damn you clowns are so naive still. This is Henderson County not ATL. I would suspect most of the traffic on I-26 is not local. Get a horse and buggy and stay off I-26.

Enjoying your lefty circle jerk?

User avatar
The Piper
Red Shirt
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 8:44 am

Re: I-26 and suburban sprawl

Unread post by The Piper » Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:01 am

Have they joined ranks with Eva?

User avatar
The Piper
Red Shirt
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 8:44 am

Re: I-26 and suburban sprawl

Unread post by The Piper » Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:21 am

Vrede wrote:
The Piper wrote:Have they joined ranks with Eva?
Like her or not, what does it matter? Discuss the issue, don't try and smear by association.
It wasn't intended as a smear. It's just that I recalled Eva being sucessful in getting this issue struck down the first time around.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe hers was a tree-hugger issue.

Post Reply