Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

A properly run conservative forum with conservative mods. ;)
Note: Conservatives abandoned this due to the need to ban everyone they disagree with.
Contact the admin if you would like to moderate this forum. The admin is more than willing to change images and theme as you see fit.
User avatar
bannination
Captain
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by bannination » Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:16 am

You have the power! Good luck.

:lol:
Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Reality » Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:01 am

banni, you must think you are talking to your lib friends. You saying we have the power is like Saddam (may his soul not RIP) telling the citizens of Iraq that the Iraqi presidential election will be free and open or telling his defected family members to come on back nothing will be done to you (may their souls RIP).

The cycinism of your intro is noted.
Supsalemgr
Major
Posts: 537
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Supsalemgr » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:29 pm

Banni created this site for reasonable conversations. Then Vrede shows up. :wtf:
User avatar
k9nanny
General
Posts: 771
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 3:11 pm

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by k9nanny » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:47 pm

Good job, banni. :thumbup:
Se Non Ora, Quando?
Supsalemgr
Major
Posts: 537
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Supsalemgr » Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:09 pm

I did it just for Vrede so he would have another thread to pontificate on. :lol: :lol:
User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by rstrong » Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:46 pm

Does this mean that anything posted or cited here from Conservapedia can be treated as factually correct?

How about WorldNetDaily? John Fogle? Glenn Beck?

What about date-sensitive facts? 15 years of Republican policy went from being the cure for commie marxist socialism to BEING commie marxist socialism overnight. Republican bank and auto-bail-outs became Democrat commie marxist socialism when Obama was elected. Iraq quickly became "Obama's War" and Obama became responsible for having invading Afghanistan. Should all facts here be date-stamped?

Are we allowed to mention the Bush II presidency? Bush I? Reagan? Nixon? Or did the Clinton administration end when Obama took the oath of office?

Will people be banned for suggesting that police or fire service is a form of socialism like healthcare? Or for pointing out that the Tea Party was a protest against LOWER taxes?

Can we get a list of things that are only OK when a Republican is in power? I know it's a long list, but perhaps we can all chip in for SQL server hosting.

Reagan: The Greatest Republican, or Republican In Name Only?

Romney: Christian, or (now that the election is over) back to being a cultist?

Is it OK for Republican Congressmen to kneel before Grover Norquist as long as they're allowed to wear knee-pads and object when he calls them "Monica"?

These and other answers need to be answered for moderators ahead of time.
User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Stinger » Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:30 pm

Considering this was designed for Divorced from Reality, the whiner who kept mewling about moderators on a forum where nothing was moderated, maybe we should change the name to "The Baby Pool."

If you have enough life guards hovering nearby, maybe Divorced from Reality will attempt to discuss an issue.

Should be good for laughs.
User avatar
bannination
Captain
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by bannination » Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:36 pm

Give them what they want, and they still whine.

-0-?
Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Reality » Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:53 pm

In typical fashion banni and his band of liberal cohorts are off to la la land in their response to my post. All the suspicious players chimed in.

banni, the forum guru, and Vred his road guard, play footsie with their lib friends and mistakenly try to convince everyone that their lib infected kool aide is gospel.

Frankly, that's okay with me because their cluster rants only go to serve how one con can keep all of them in a literary feeding frenzy. "Let me see if I can top Vred with this snippet of literary genius"!

Sick is to kind!
User avatar
bannination
Captain
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by bannination » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:04 pm

So this is what it's like with the cons in control......

:yawn:
User avatar
mike
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 652
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:47 pm

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by mike » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:12 pm

You expected anything different? Image
Image
Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Reality » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:14 pm

No banni, it's what it's like with libs in control. Go back to the first response in this thread.

You didn't build this thread or any thread for that matter, to encourage a free exchange of ideas. You built this thread and the others to promote your personal liberal agenda and placed the likes of Vrede as an administrator to further your cause.

You are the sickest of the sickos and your sicko cohorts for some ungodly reason support what you are doing.
User avatar
mike
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 652
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:47 pm

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by mike » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:21 pm

Reality wrote:No banni, it's what it's like with libs in control. Go back to the first response in this thread.

You didn't build this thread or any thread for that matter, to encourage a free exchange of ideas. You built this thread and the others to promote your personal liberal agenda and placed the likes of Vrede as an administrator to further your cause.

You are the sickest of the sickos and your sicko cohorts for some ungodly reason support what you are doing.
Not quite, BU. Your "sicko" reference is a duly noted smear - will you delete your own post?
Everyone is free to post. Just make sure what you're posting is factual.

Just sayin' Image
Last edited by mike on Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image
User avatar
bannination
Captain
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by bannination » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:22 pm

Reality wrote:No banni, it's what it's like with libs in control. Go back to the first response in this thread.

You didn't build this thread or any thread for that matter, to encourage a free exchange of ideas. You built this thread and the others to promote your personal liberal agenda and placed the likes of Vrede as an administrator to further your cause.

You are the sickest of the sickos and your sicko cohorts for some ungodly reason support what you are doing.

They're my lackies not cohorts, remember?

So what is it exactly I'm doing besides sitting here enjoying the evening reading "The Universe from Nothing" by Lawrence Krauss. Excellent book so far BTW.
8-)

Wait, I "appointed" people to control spam.... so does that mean those stupid via-gra spammers were the conservative agenda all along??? It all makes sense now!

Appointed is actually the wrong word, it's actually a burden, it's not like they're paid and what benefit do they get out of it?

Will we ever understand "Reality's" reasoning.... probably not.
User avatar
bannination
Captain
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by bannination » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:30 pm

mike wrote:
Reality wrote:No banni, it's what it's like with libs in control. Go back to the first response in this thread.

You didn't build this thread or any thread for that matter, to encourage a free exchange of ideas. You built this thread and the others to promote your personal liberal agenda and placed the likes of Vrede as an administrator to further your cause.

You are the sickest of the sickos and your sicko cohorts for some ungodly reason support what you are doing.
Not quite, BU. Your "sicko" reference is a duly noted smear - will you delete your own post?
Everyone is free to post. Just make sure what you're posting is factual.

Just sayin' Image
Conservatives censor themselves? Not a chance! ;)
User avatar
mike
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 652
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:47 pm

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by mike » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:37 pm

bannination wrote:
mike wrote:
Reality wrote:No banni, it's what it's like with libs in control. Go back to the first response in this thread.

You didn't build this thread or any thread for that matter, to encourage a free exchange of ideas. You built this thread and the others to promote your personal liberal agenda and placed the likes of Vrede as an administrator to further your cause.

You are the sickest of the sickos and your sicko cohorts for some ungodly reason support what you are doing.
Not quite, BU. Your "sicko" reference is a duly noted smear - will you delete your own post?
Everyone is free to post. Just make sure what you're posting is factual.

Just sayin' Image
Conservatives censor themselves? Not a chance! ;)
Whining appears to suit them better ... Image
Image
User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 3223
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by neoplacebo » Tue Dec 11, 2012 8:03 am

I would like to see the cons stop whining, take control of this subject, and perhaps, hopefully, maybe, answer some of our good northern neighbor rstrongs questions he posed to them yesterday at 3:46. I realize this is an extreme long shot, and has about as much chance of happening as us nuking Israel, but still I hold out hope (not that we nuke Israel, but that one or more of the cons will answer one or more of the questions).
Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Reality » Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:04 pm

PBO, rstrong's question are in the words of Vred, "silly".

Besides, banni said this was a con forum. You, rstrong and the other lefties need to go back to your forum. If we cons want anything from the left, which I'm sure we don't, we will take your request under consideration.
Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Reality » Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:14 pm

Vred, the Karnack of the left. Look at the title of this thread one more time and tell me if you see the word "your".

Okay, do you see it. Now are you a "your"? If not, pack your liberal pious laced rhetoric and hit the road.
User avatar
bannination
Captain
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by bannination » Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:06 pm

All this talk of wet nurses is making me thirsty.

-0-?
Post Reply