Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

A properly run conservative forum with conservative mods. ;)
Note: Conservatives abandoned this due to the need to ban everyone they disagree with.
Contact the admin if you would like to moderate this forum. The admin is more than willing to change images and theme as you see fit.
User avatar
mike
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 652
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:47 pm

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by mike » Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:30 am

Reality wrote:God old dingle. Never misses a chance to solidify "its" postion as the forum dunce. The lack of an extensive vocabulary is noted.
And you equate your reference to Stinger as "Dingle" as indicative of you "having an extensive vocabulary?"

Weird, Big Ugly.

You might want to look up the proper spelling of "postion" while you're increasing your vocabulary.

Just sayin ... Image
Image

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Stinger » Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:24 am

Reality wrote:God old dingle. Never misses a chance to solidify "its" postion as the forum dunce. The lack of an extensive vocabulary is noted.
I notice your vocabulary isn't anywhere near mine.

I notice you've never discredited or disproved anything I've said.

I notice the only thing you've got to back up your stupid snark is more stupid snark.

If you can't keep up with the forum dunce, what does that make you? I believe you just solidified your "position" as forum turd.

Run out and blame someone else for your incompetence. That's your schtick.

User avatar
bannination
Captain
Posts: 4584
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by bannination » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:19 am

Wow, they've done a great job of cleaning up the forum and name calling so far!

Kudos to the cons!

:-H

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Reality » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:16 pm

Oh, so now we have two forum spell checkers. The Vrud and Mike. You're in good company Mike. Although good for what totally escapes me.

Vrud, you are improving your "blame" technique.

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Stinger » Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:46 pm

Divorced from Reality wrote:. Although good for what totally escapes me.
Let's add that to the list of things that totally escape you . . . including REALITY.

Image

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Stinger » Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:27 pm

Wow! A conservative-moderated echo chamber crying out for some wingnut Kool Aid, and not a con in sight.

Wouldn't it be safer to play over here in Con World where conservatives rule rather than continue to hang out where the forum nazi deletes their posts, suspends them, spanks them, etc.? They must be scared to death.

Give some people what they ask for and they're still miserable.

Then they try to accuse others of their own affliction -- misery.

Classic Freudian projection by a rather dim bulb.

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by rstrong » Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:26 am

rstrong wrote:
Reality wrote:rstrong, since you present yourself as a conservative could you describe a Canadian liberal?
Liberal. A little to the left of your Democrats, although the last couple of Liberal administrations were admirably fiscally conservative. Less pro-business and pro-free-trade than the Conservative Party. More government services via higher taxes, where the Conservative Party wants less government services for lower taxes.

(As opposed to the US where the Republicans ALSO want more government services via higher taxes - they merely differ with the Democrats on WHICH government services should get more funding and who should pay those taxes.)

Our Conservative Party is to the right of your Republicans - not to the right of what Republicans campaign on, but to the certainly to the right of Republicans once elected.

Your turn. What makes you think I'm not a conservative? (Hint: Being a Palin/Bachmann/Santorum Republican does not make you a conservative. Being a Tea Partier certainly does not make you a conservative.) Not that I expect you to be capable of a rational answer this time either.
As expected, once again "Reality" is unable to answer.

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Reality » Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:26 pm

Reality does have things to do other than stand by his computer and wait with bated breath on the next intellectual post from the left especially the Dunce of the Left, the infamous First Name Dingle. I have been traveling on highways I did not build but my taxes did help, attended a granddaughter's gradutaion from college not paid for by the USG (so you won't see her at the next OWS love in), and doing what those who believe in the real spirit of Christmas usually do this time of year. "It's a Wonderful Life".

As for you rstrong, are you pro abortion rights in all situations, pro big government, anti rich, 2nd Amenment advocate, pro State's rights, anti States rights, and do you agree with banni that guns were made to kill people or do you think they are made to protect people? After you respond, we can continue. As a general observation, I do not recall that your post have been other than of a left orientation.

User avatar
bannination
Captain
Posts: 4584
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by bannination » Sun Dec 16, 2012 4:14 pm

Stinger wrote:
Divorced from Reality wrote:. Although good for what totally escapes me.
Let's add that to the list of things that totally escape you . . . including REALITY.

Image

That picture was such an awesome compliment to your comment.
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Reality » Sun Dec 16, 2012 5:34 pm

Dingle, my fellow non libs/lefties realize it only takes one of us to engage multiple libs/lefties so they have left this thread to me. Now if you will step aside with your usual noncontributory post, rstrong and I can continue with his conversion to a real con. He has routinely demonstrated the IQ to be a con while you have routinely demonstrated that you can fill a supportimg role in the remake of Blazing Saddles. Guess what role that may be?

User avatar
bannination
Captain
Posts: 4584
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by bannination » Sun Dec 16, 2012 5:55 pm

Reality wrote:Dingle, my fellow non libs/lefties realize it only takes one of us to engage multiple libs/lefties so they have left this thread to me. Now if you will step aside with your usual noncontributory post, rstrong and I can continue with his conversion to a real con. He has routinely demonstrated the IQ to be a con while you have routinely demonstrated that you can fill a supportimg role in the remake of Blazing Saddles. Guess what role that may be?
So when do you start?

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Stinger » Sun Dec 16, 2012 7:22 pm

Reality wrote:Dingle, my fellow non libs/lefties realize it only takes one of us to engage multiple libs/lefties so they have left this thread to me. Good move. It only takes one con on this forum to move the whole conversation from intelligent to full retard, and no one can do that better than you. Now if you will step aside with your usual noncontributory post, Uh, Dumbass. Let's look at how many of your posts are non-contributory. That's the only area where you have a positive batting average, and it's hovering around 1.000. rstrong and I can continue with his conversion to a real con. He has routinely demonstrated the IQ to be a con while you have routinely demonstrated that you can fill a supportimg role in the remake of Blazing Saddles. Guess what role that may be? I don't know, but I've got you pegged for Madeline Kahn. Of course, if you can't sing, you can always play the horse Mongo knocks out. I think Mongo's too far beyond your capabilities, both physically and mentally.

Are you finally getting the courage up to actually comment on a topic for a change?

This should be good.

Divorced from Reality attempts to say something about an issue. Divorced from Reality gets everything bass-ackward. Divorced from Reality gets his ass handed to him on a silver platter . . . AGAIN. Divorced from Reality runs aways . . . AGAIN. Divorced from Reality shows back up on another thread, carping from the sidelines, talking about others and refusing to discuss a topic for another month.

Rinse, lather, repeat.

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Reality » Sun Dec 16, 2012 7:24 pm

banni, I thought you were paying better attention. Can you not read what has been going on since you tried to make this a con thread but no one took the bait. I'm here to engage all the SA post that the usual lefties have made and then swarm like flies on cow pies.

Right now rstrong, Vred, Dingle, and you are engaged and I'm the only con.

Good example of the lefty swarm. I ask rstrong a question and Vred breaks down the entire post before rstrong has an opportunity to respond and now you throw in your two cents. Get the "picture". Ut oh, I used another military term that Vred will try to redefine.

User avatar
bannination
Captain
Posts: 4584
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by bannination » Sun Dec 16, 2012 7:27 pm

Reality wrote:banni, I thought you were paying better attention. Can you not read what has been going on since you tried to make this a con thread but no one took the bait. I'm here to engage all the SA post that the usual lefties have made and then swarm like flies on cow pies.

Right now rstrong, Vred, Dingle, and you are engaged and I'm the only con.

Good example of the lefty swarm. I ask rstrong a question and Vred breaks down the entire post before rstrong has an opportunity to respond and now you throw in your two cents. Get the "picture". Ut oh, I used another military term that Vred will try to redefine.

Apparently not starting anytime soon. -0-?

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Stinger » Sun Dec 16, 2012 7:35 pm

Reality wrote:banni, I thought you were paying better attention. Can you not read what has been going on since you tried to make this a con thread but no one took the bait. I'm here to engage all the SA post that the usual lefties have made and then swarm like flies on cow pies.

You gotta admit . . . you are one big cow pie.

Image

Something along that magnitude.


Right now rstrong, Vred, Dingle, and you are engaged and I'm the only con.

Here ya go.

Image

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by rstrong » Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:25 am

rstrong wrote:
rstrong wrote:
Reality wrote:rstrong, since you present yourself as a conservative could you describe a Canadian liberal?
Liberal. A little to the left of your Democrats, although the last couple of Liberal administrations were admirably fiscally conservative. Less pro-business and pro-free-trade than the Conservative Party. More government services via higher taxes, where the Conservative Party wants less government services for lower taxes.

(As opposed to the US where the Republicans ALSO want more government services via higher taxes - they merely differ with the Democrats on WHICH government services should get more funding and who should pay those taxes.)

Our Conservative Party is to the right of your Republicans - not to the right of what Republicans campaign on, but to the certainly to the right of Republicans once elected.

Your turn. What makes you think I'm not a conservative? (Hint: Being a Palin/Bachmann/Santorum Republican does not make you a conservative. Being a Tea Partier certainly does not make you a conservative.) Not that I expect you to be capable of a rational answer this time either.
As expected, once again "Reality" is unable to answer.
And still he hasn't:
Reality wrote:Reality does have things to do other than stand by his computer and wait with bated breath....
You demand answers from others, and yet even when they respond, you're completely unable to answer the most basic questions about your own claims. Stop being such a pissant.

I answered your question and again asked the obvious question in return. Again, you ran away.
Reality wrote:After you respond, we can continue.
You've already stated so a number of times that I'm left-wing and non-conservative. Not that you've ever been capable of answering why, but you've made up your mind, so you don't need any further information from me.

You asked me a question. I answered. It's your turn.
Reality wrote:"It's a Wonderful Life".
The FBI Considered "It's A Wonderful Life" to be communist propaganda. They thought Life smeared American values such as wealth and free enterprise while glorifying anti-American values such as the triumph of the common man.

You leftie, you.
Reality wrote:I do not recall that your post have been other than of a left orientation.
I'm firmly in the center. On the left/right/authoritarian/libertarian test posted here a while ago. I'm just about dead-center on the left-right scale, just half a square left of center. On the authoritarian/libertarian scale I'm deep into the libertarian side.

There's not much difference between libertarian and liberal, so for an authoritarian like yourself it's understandable if you think I'm liberal.

But we're talking about the word conservative, which is not the opposite of libertarian or liberal or left. For all your claims that I'm not a conservative, yet again you're still unable to explain why.

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Reality » Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:04 am

Sorry Vred, but your knowledge of the military, or lack thereof, doesn't allow you to know the difference between what's accurate and what's not.

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by rstrong » Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:07 am

Reality wrote:Sorry Vred, but your knowledge of the military, or lack thereof, doesn't allow you to know the difference between what's accurate and what's not.
Sorry Reality, but your knowledge of the military, or lack thereof, doesn't allow you to know the difference between what's accurate and what's not.

Apparently that goes for many other subjects. Politics especially.

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Reality » Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:01 pm

You must be using the wrong sources because you haven't got it right yet?

Problem is Vred, you do not know enought about the military to know if your source is correct.

It's for sure you are the google queen of the forum.

User avatar
Boatrocker
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2048
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Southeast of Disorder

Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!

Unread post by Boatrocker » Wed Mar 27, 2013 3:04 pm

Sure is quiet in here. Is the likelihood of some non-RWer posting in here so frightening that the RWers stay away, even when they are given carte blanche? WTF?
"On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron." — H. L. Mencken, July 26, 1920, in The Baltimore Evening Sun

Post Reply