Not on this birthday, but she looks like she's still having fun.
Chelsea Handler, 48, once again celebrates her birthday by skiing in a bikini
https://www.instagram.com/reel/CpF76SiJ ... _copy_link
Not on this birthday, but she looks like she's still having fun.
Bazinga! Was there ever a Tucker disavowal and/or hackers claiming credit?GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 12:25 pmSo, this is real.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Angry_Staffe ... 8139150338
https://mobile.twitter.com/TuckerCarlson
Nope, it was real.Vrede too wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 7:27 amBazinga! Was there ever a Tucker disavowal and/or hackers claiming credit?GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 12:25 pmSo, this is real.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Angry_Staffe ... 8139150338
https://mobile.twitter.com/TuckerCarlson
Enraged Fox News Host Warns After Trump Indictment: ‘People Better Be Careful’
Jesse Watters and the Cult .45 are America-hating terrorists, and Faux Noise funds terrorism by paying Watters. Shame.
GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 9:21 amNope, it was real.Vrede too wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 7:27 amBazinga! Was there ever a Tucker disavowal and/or hackers claiming credit?GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 12:25 pmSo, this is real.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Angry_Staffe ... 8139150338
https://mobile.twitter.com/TuckerCarlson
Enraged Fox News Host Warns After Trump Indictment: ‘People Better Be Careful’
Jesse Watters and the Cult .45 are America-hating terrorists, and Faux Noise funds terrorism by paying Watters. Shame.
You mean Tucker did it as sarcasm? I guess I was thrown off by:I thought it was done to Tucker rather than by Tucker.Angry Staffer
@Angry_Staffer
Either Tucker has been hacked or his social media manager is *pissed*
Wingnuts are so funny, being soooooo outraged at something the entire world knew was coming.
Did they really think there wasn't going to be indictments?
When the indictments didn't come on the Tuesday that Dolt .45 predicted he told the Cult .45 that it meant the case was being dropped. RWers are convinced that the case is too weak to pursue. I heard on NPR that 93% of RepuQs believe that the prosecution is political rather than criminal, 93%.
Vrede too wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:41 am
When the indictments didn't come on the Tuesday that Dolt .45 predicted he told the Cult .45 that it meant the case was being dropped. RWers are convinced that the case is too weak to pursue. I heard on NPR that 93% of RepuQs believe that the prosecution is political rather than criminal, 93%.
They weren't nearly as delusional before fox.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:53 amVrede too wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:41 am
When the indictments didn't come on the Tuesday that Dolt .45 predicted he told the Cult .45 that it meant the case was being dropped. RWers are convinced that the case is too weak to pursue. I heard on NPR that 93% of RepuQs believe that the prosecution is political rather than criminal, 93%.
Proving they're 93% delusional.
Seems like they're in their throwing it against the wall and see what sticks phase.O Really wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:23 pmThe choices of what these people are saying are limited, none of which show their strength of intellect.
1. He didn't do it. Well, yes, he did, and has admitted it in the past.
2. He did it, but it's not illegal. Maybe debatable, but a lot of people who are actual prosecutors think so. Seems a valid question for court.
3. He did it, and it's illegal, but he should be let off anyway. (probably the prevalent real opinion)
His (truly obnoxious) lawyer offered a somewhat rational defense saying it was just a private settlement agreement and not illegal. Good try, and it may have even been true if they hadn't tried to hide and launder the payment.
Gut feeling is there's going to be a lot more than that.
LOL
I'm seeing a lot of:O Really wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:23 pmThe choices of what these people are saying are limited, none of which show their strength of intellect.
1. He didn't do it. Well, yes, he did, and has admitted it in the past.
2. He did it, but it's not illegal. Maybe debatable, but a lot of people who are actual prosecutors think so. Seems a valid question for court.
3. He did it, and it's illegal, but he should be let off anyway. (probably the prevalent real opinion)
Or applications could require your MAGA ID#neoplacebo wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 7:28 amThis thing in NY is like a traffic ticket compared to what's coming from GA and Jack Smith. Those two cases will result in some major whining....whining like no ones ever seen before. I'm hoping Smith convicts him of sedition or insurrection, which will prevent him from ever holding elective office at the state or federal level. Hell, to me, his incitement of the mob and his own statement that he'd pardon them and apologize to them if he becomes president again are proof to me of giving aid and comfort to insurrectionists.
I remember when I first began applying for a job here in TN in the late sixties. Virtually all job applications had this question: "Are you or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party"? Maybe in another twenty years job applicants may have to answer this one: "Are you or have you ever been a member of a MAGA organization?" I think it would be prudent to do this.
Yeah, well, either way, I'll likely not be around to see which way it went. But I hold out hope that there are more rational Americans than there are gullible fools.billy.pilgrim wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 10:33 amOr applications could require your MAGA ID#neoplacebo wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 7:28 amThis thing in NY is like a traffic ticket compared to what's coming from GA and Jack Smith. Those two cases will result in some major whining....whining like no ones ever seen before. I'm hoping Smith convicts him of sedition or insurrection, which will prevent him from ever holding elective office at the state or federal level. Hell, to me, his incitement of the mob and his own statement that he'd pardon them and apologize to them if he becomes president again are proof to me of giving aid and comfort to insurrectionists.
I remember when I first began applying for a job here in TN in the late sixties. Virtually all job applications had this question: "Are you or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party"? Maybe in another twenty years job applicants may have to answer this one: "Are you or have you ever been a member of a MAGA organization?" I think it would be prudent to do this.
There lies my worry.neoplacebo wrote: ↑Sun Apr 02, 2023 7:41 amYeah, well, either way, I'll likely not be around to see which way it went. But I hold out hope that there are more rational Americans than there are gullible fools.billy.pilgrim wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 10:33 amOr applications could require your MAGA ID#neoplacebo wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 7:28 amThis thing in NY is like a traffic ticket compared to what's coming from GA and Jack Smith. Those two cases will result in some major whining....whining like no ones ever seen before. I'm hoping Smith convicts him of sedition or insurrection, which will prevent him from ever holding elective office at the state or federal level. Hell, to me, his incitement of the mob and his own statement that he'd pardon them and apologize to them if he becomes president again are proof to me of giving aid and comfort to insurrectionists.
I remember when I first began applying for a job here in TN in the late sixties. Virtually all job applications had this question: "Are you or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party"? Maybe in another twenty years job applicants may have to answer this one: "Are you or have you ever been a member of a MAGA organization?" I think it would be prudent to do this.
This won't last.