She was responsible for not carrying insurance.Vrede too wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 12:44 amYOU read your words again. You didn't say anything about having ACA coverage. All you said was that you were no longer trapped by your preexisting conditions thanks to ACA.billy.pilgrim wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 12:20 amWhat do you mean - no experience with the aca? Read it again
Billie Sue is still in the aca and my son was on our family plan and then my wife’s plan for 5 years.
Yes, I have plenty of 1st hand experience with private insurance and with the aca.
Edit:
Yes I saw O Really’s well reasoned post. He’s right to a large degree, it’s just that I believe that I’ve seen enough to call her a typical republican grifter.
Anyhow, OUR experience with ACA is of limited relevance without knowing Retton's income and liquidity.
Once again, Mary Lou did ZERO fundraising.
Sorry, but I thought it was clear that the aca was the only way around obtaining coverage with a preexisting condition. I don’t know your experience with private healthcare insurance, it’s beat me up over the years, leaving me fairly well versed in the tricks use to mistreat consumers.
And, not that I expect anyone to remember all of my posts, I’ve complained several times here about my problems getting my son onto my aca policy.
And sorry again, but I can’t accept that she didn’t have the means. Nothing I read about her, other than her own words, indicates that she couldn’t afford insurance.
Add to the facts that here we are after she’s home the family says any excess monies will be given to a charity of her choice, but neither she or the family admits the cost for her hospitalization for pneumonia, or the name of the charity.
It all seems so very maga to me.