DOGE

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 58499
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: DOGE

Unread post by Vrede too »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Thu Jun 26, 2025 10:12 pm
Vrede too wrote:
Thu Jun 26, 2025 9:33 pm

Translation:
Sen Budd sounds like a woke lib. SoupySales has already persuaded me and is writing responses for me. CPB ain't getting shit, deal with it.
Do the asshole staffers get really drunk after they've written these responses and make fun of them?
:angry-banghead:
Congress Passes Bill Defunding Public Radio – What’s Next
American Coalition for Public Radio
From: info@goacpr.org
To: (Vrede too)

Image

Congress just voted to end federal support for public radio. But our fight isn’t over.

Hello (Vrede too),

Overnight, the House passed the Rescissions Act, which clawed back $1.1B in funding for public media through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB). There’s no sugar coating it — this is a devastating result for local public radio stations nationwide and the entire public media system.

Seventy percent of the funding, intended for local stations in every U.S. state and territory, is now lost. All local stations will feel the impact of this decision, and those serving rural, Tribal, and otherwise underserved communities will be disproportionately affected. Stations will go dark.

Despite this setback, the support from you and your neighbors for your local stations was heard loud and clear. In just a few short weeks, hundreds of thousands of emails, calls, video messages, and social media posts were shared by public radio supporters in communities throughout the country, demonstrating the widespread value of this community resource. To be clear: this outcome is not a reflection of a lack of popular support for public radio — poll after poll demonstrates that Americans across both parties back continued federal support for public media and their local stations by a large margin.


Americans across the country stand with public radio.

While this vote was a setback, our fight isn’t over. The rescission bill passed by a narrow margin, and despite the result, many lawmakers expressed concerns over its impact and may seek to restore future funding. The annual appropriations process, which has funded CPB for over 50 years, is still in its early stages. We will continue to advocate for restoring federal support for public radio through that process, and will exhaust every avenue to save your local stations. And we will ask you to join us in this fight.

For now, we want to extend our sincere gratitude for all of your messages, calls, and outreach to your elected officials. We will let you know soon when we will need to call on you again.

Our mailing address is:
American Coalition for Public Radio
1111 N Capitol St NE Washington, DC 20002-7502 USA
:cry:

:angry-cussing: I believe the Rescissions Act clawed back $9B total. All the things that Dementia Don did without congressional authorization - USAID, etc - now has that authorization.
F' ELON
and the
FELON

1312. ETTD. 86 47.

supesalemgr2
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2025 1:21 pm

Re: DOGE

Unread post by supesalemgr2 »

Vrede too wrote:
Fri Jul 18, 2025 11:54 am
GoCubsGo wrote:
Thu Jun 26, 2025 10:12 pm
Vrede too wrote:
Thu Jun 26, 2025 9:33 pm

Translation:
Sen Budd sounds like a woke lib. SoupySales has already persuaded me and is writing responses for me. CPB ain't getting shit, deal with it.
Do the asshole staffers get really drunk after they've written these responses and make fun of them?
:angry-banghead:
Congress Passes Bill Defunding Public Radio – What’s Next
American Coalition for Public Radio
From: info@goacpr.org
To: (Vrede too)

Image

Congress just voted to end federal support for public radio. But our fight isn’t over.

Hello (Vrede too),

Overnight, the House passed the Rescissions Act, which clawed back $1.1B in funding for public media through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB). There’s no sugar coating it — this is a devastating result for local public radio stations nationwide and the entire public media system.

Seventy percent of the funding, intended for local stations in every U.S. state and territory, is now lost. All local stations will feel the impact of this decision, and those serving rural, Tribal, and otherwise underserved communities will be disproportionately affected. Stations will go dark.

Despite this setback, the support from you and your neighbors for your local stations was heard loud and clear. In just a few short weeks, hundreds of thousands of emails, calls, video messages, and social media posts were shared by public radio supporters in communities throughout the country, demonstrating the widespread value of this community resource. To be clear: this outcome is not a reflection of a lack of popular support for public radio — poll after poll demonstrates that Americans across both parties back continued federal support for public media and their local stations by a large margin.


Americans across the country stand with public radio.

While this vote was a setback, our fight isn’t over. The rescission bill passed by a narrow margin, and despite the result, many lawmakers expressed concerns over its impact and may seek to restore future funding. The annual appropriations process, which has funded CPB for over 50 years, is still in its early stages. We will continue to advocate for restoring federal support for public radio through that process, and will exhaust every avenue to save your local stations. And we will ask you to join us in this fight.

For now, we want to extend our sincere gratitude for all of your messages, calls, and outreach to your elected officials. We will let you know soon when we will need to call on you again.

Our mailing address is:
American Coalition for Public Radio
1111 N Capitol St NE Washington, DC 20002-7502 USA
:cry:

:angry-cussing: I believe the Rescissions Act clawed back $9B total. All the things that Dementia Don did without congressional authorization - USAID, etc - now has that authorization.
Good idea. Solicit funds from the folks who enjoy the stations.

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 22586
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: DOGE

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

Wouldn't surprise me if PBS resorted to paid advertising. Small price to pay and there's no longer a reason not to.
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.


Foxtrot
Delta
Tango

supesalemgr2
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2025 1:21 pm

Re: DOGE

Unread post by supesalemgr2 »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Fri Jul 18, 2025 12:55 pm
Wouldn't surprise me if PBS resorted to paid advertising. Small price to pay and there's no longer a reason not to.
Novel idea. Paid advertising to support your enterprise.

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 58499
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: DOGE

Unread post by Vrede too »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Fri Jul 18, 2025 12:55 pm
Wouldn't surprise me if PBS resorted to paid advertising. Small price to pay and there's no longer a reason not to.
They already do, somewhat, with their corporate sponsorships. We may see more of that, with more blatant ads. It's a delicate balance - if they go too far it won't be PBS/NPR to us anymore. :problem:
F' ELON
and the
FELON

1312. ETTD. 86 47.

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 22586
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: DOGE

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

Vrede too wrote:
Fri Jul 18, 2025 2:02 pm
GoCubsGo wrote:
Fri Jul 18, 2025 12:55 pm
Wouldn't surprise me if PBS resorted to paid advertising. Small price to pay and there's no longer a reason not to.
They already do, somewhat, with their corporate sponsorships. We may see more of that, with more blatant ads. It's a delicate balance - if they go too far it won't be PBS/NPR to us anymore. :problem:
From AI chat.

PBS has specific advertising restrictions that differentiate it from commercial broadcasters.

Funding Sources

PBS primarily relies on government funding, viewer donations, and corporate sponsorships rather than traditional advertising.
Sponsorship Guidelines

Corporate sponsors can promote their products or services, but PBS limits the nature and frequency of these messages.
Sponsorship messages must be brief and cannot include promotional language or calls to action.
Content Restrictions

PBS prohibits advertising for certain categories, including:
Alcohol
Tobacco
Political campaigns
Prescription drugs
Educational Focus

The network emphasizes educational content, and any sponsorship must align with its mission to provide educational programming.
Compliance and Oversight

PBS adheres to guidelines set by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), ensuring compliance with public broadcasting standards.
These restrictions help maintain PBS's commitment to educational and public service programming while providing a distinct alternative to commercial media.


Without government subsidies they should be free to do what they need to do to survive without hurting content,
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.


Foxtrot
Delta
Tango

supesalemgr2
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2025 1:21 pm

Re: DOGE

Unread post by supesalemgr2 »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Fri Jul 18, 2025 3:00 pm
Vrede too wrote:
Fri Jul 18, 2025 2:02 pm
GoCubsGo wrote:
Fri Jul 18, 2025 12:55 pm
Wouldn't surprise me if PBS resorted to paid advertising. Small price to pay and there's no longer a reason not to.
They already do, somewhat, with their corporate sponsorships. We may see more of that, with more blatant ads. It's a delicate balance - if they go too far it won't be PBS/NPR to us anymore. :problem:
From AI chat.

PBS has specific advertising restrictions that differentiate it from commercial broadcasters.

Funding Sources

PBS primarily relies on government funding, viewer donations, and corporate sponsorships rather than traditional advertising.
Sponsorship Guidelines

Corporate sponsors can promote their products or services, but PBS limits the nature and frequency of these messages.
Sponsorship messages must be brief and cannot include promotional language or calls to action.
Content Restrictions

PBS prohibits advertising for certain categories, including:
Alcohol
Tobacco
Political campaigns
Prescription drugs
Educational Focus

The network emphasizes educational content, and any sponsorship must align with its mission to provide educational programming.
Compliance and Oversight

PBS adheres to guidelines set by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), ensuring compliance with public broadcasting standards.
These restrictions help maintain PBS's commitment to educational and public service programming while providing a distinct alternative to commercial media.


Without government subsidies they should be free to do what they need to do to survive without hurting content,
I agree. If there is no fed money, they should have no say.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23443
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: DOGE

Unread post by O Really »

supesalemgr2 wrote:
Fri Jul 18, 2025 3:02 pm

I agree. If there is no fed money, they should have no say.
I'm sure CBS will be happy to hear that.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23443
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: DOGE

Unread post by O Really »

Other than the ignorant anti-woke people, I really don't understand the antipathy toward PBS. It's partially (@15%) government funded, to be able to provide high quality programming to areas that might not otherwise be able to afford it, and to provide access to a wide variety of programming not generally available on commercial networks. It's similar to museums and parks, few of which would work as completely commercial entities. Available to all, with all having a choice as to whether to go to the park, visit the museum, or watch PBS.

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 22586
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: DOGE

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

O Really wrote:
Fri Jul 18, 2025 4:54 pm
Other than the ignorant anti-woke people, I really don't understand the antipathy toward PBS. It's partially (@15%) government funded, to be able to provide high quality programming to areas that might not otherwise be able to afford it, and to provide access to a wide variety of programming not generally available on commercial networks. It's similar to museums and parks, few of which would work as completely commercial entities. Available to all, with all having a choice as to whether to go to the park, visit the museum, or watch PBS.
It's "woke." ;)

Too much Ken Burns, not enough monster trucks and WWE.
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.


Foxtrot
Delta
Tango

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23443
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: DOGE

Unread post by O Really »

Oh. I guess also too much "Masterpiece" and not enough "Maury."

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 22586
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: DOGE

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

O Really wrote:
Fri Jul 18, 2025 8:40 pm
Oh. I guess also too much "Masterpiece" and not enough "Maury."
:lol: :clap:

No wonder PBS doesn't make any money.

Image

Image
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.


Foxtrot
Delta
Tango

Post Reply