Epstein list release predictions and followup

[Vrede too]

Bet there's pics.

Eww, maybe not everything has to be released to the public.

Don't release the naked Trumpstein files. Thank you.

Ewwww.

I was thinking more like.....

Is Jabba wearing pants?

[GoCubsGo]

]
Is Jabba wearing pants?

Melania, who is contemplating whether she would've been better off marrying Epstein says no.

[Whack9]

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... ails-trump

Email exchanges with friends and associates showed Epstein disparaging Trump. In one December 2018 correspondence, Epstein told former treasury secretary Larry Summers that “trump – borderline insane. dersh, a few feet further from the border but not by much” – apparently referencing his one-time attorney, Alan Dershowitz.

Summers asked: “Will trump crack into insanity?”

“This is not a new phenomenon for him. in the past he was told not to come out of his apt. thats how he got through near personal bankruptcy. is strength is remarkable. he is pounded 24/7,” Epstein replied. “I hope someone close to him gets indicted, but not sure, otherwise the pressure of the unknown will force him to do crazy things.”

...

In another exchange in March 2018, Landon Thomas Jr, then a reporter at the New York Times, sent Epstein an article from the Daily Beast that mused on whether Trump was close to a “psychiatric breakdown”. Epstein replied: “he feels alone, and is nuts !!! , I told everyone from day one. evil beyond belief mad, and most thought i was speaking metaphorically, its obvious he could crack. stormy daniels. ? lies after lies after lies.”

...

The newly released documents were published shortly after House Democrats on the oversight committee released three separate previously unseen email exchanges sent by Epstein in 2011, 2015 and 2019, where the disgraced financier described Trump as the “dog that hasn’t barked” and alleged Trump had “spent hours” at Epstein’s home with one of Epstein’s victims, and claimed that “of course” Trump “knew about the girls”.

In a statement, the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said Democrats had “selectively leaked emails to the liberal media to create a fake narrative to smear President Trump”. She added that the unnamed victim referenced in the emails was the late Virginia Giuffre, whom she said “repeatedly said President Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing whatsoever”.

Okay. Then why is Trump trying to hard to prevent the release of more correspondence? If the leaks were selective, you'd think they'd want to have the rest of it released so that the whole narrative could be seen. Fighting tooth and nail to prevent that just makes him look guilty.

[supesalemgr2]

I for one is all for releasing all the Epstein info and let the chips fall where they may.

As for Epstein and his opinion of Trump. He has little credibility. A certified low life. It is no surprise He has no good feelings for Trump since Trump embarrassed him by booting from the Mara Lago Club.

[GoCubsGo]

I for one is all for releasing all the Epstein info and let the chips fall where they may.

As for Epstein and his opinion of Trump. He has little credibility. A certified low life. It is no surprise He has no good feelings for Trump since Trump embarrassed him by booting from the Mara Lago Club.

The club of which he wasn't a member?

Did they secretly spend Thanksgiving together in 2017?

And yet credibility and special treatment is given to multiple convicted felon pedophile Ghislane by the DonOld DOJ.

Make it make sense.

[supesalemgr2]

I for one is all for releasing all the Epstein info and let the chips fall where they may.

As for Epstein and his opinion of Trump. He has little credibility. A certified low life. It is no surprise He has no good feelings for Trump since Trump embarrassed him by booting from the Mara Lago Club.

The club of which he wasn't a member? OK. So he was banned from the club. If you have different info, please share.

Did they secretly spend Thanksgiving together in 2017? Do you have info we do not have?

And yet credibility and special treatment is given to multiple convicted felon pedophile Ghislane by the DonOld DOJ. Any special treatment will be questioned.

Make it make sense.

[Vrede too]

The club of which he wasn't a member?

Did they secretly spend Thanksgiving together in 2017?

And yet credibility and special treatment is given to multiple convicted felon pedophile Ghislane by the DonOld DOJ.

Make it make sense.

Why was Epstein booted from the Mar-a-Lardo Club, if it happened at all? As usual, that story has changed over time. First it was for diddling minors, but then DonOLD decided he never knew about that at all. Then, it was for poaching a very low level employee. Seriously? That doesn't pass the sniff test. Dementia Don is a businessman, albeit a mediocre one. Employees leave for better opportunities all the time, and should. Treat them better and they're less likely to, duh. If not over the minor-diddling that DonOLD knew EVERYTHING about Epstein sure wasn't 86ed over worker poaching. It wasn't like it was a VP.

[GoCubsGo]

The club of which he wasn't a member? OK. So he was banned from the club. If you have different info, please share.

It's in the emails.

Newly released emails made public by the House Oversight Committee suggest Jeffrey Epstein disputed Donald Trump’s claim that he was banned from Mar-a-Lago, saying he was “never a member ever.” Epstein also wrote that Trump “knew about the girls,” referencing the victims of his trafficking network.

Jeffrey Epstein wrote in a 2019 email that “Trump said he asked me to resign, never a member ever,” a line that both asserts Trump intervened and simultaneously denies a formal membership, producing an internal contradiction in Epstein’s account that complicates verification. The emails released by the House Oversight Committee are the primary contemporaneous documents cited in reporting and show Epstein referencing Mar‑a‑Lago and Trump’s alleged knowledge of his victims, which confirms Epstein associated the club with his relationship with Trump but does not by itself produce an independent membership record [3] [1] [2]. The content of the emails shows Epstein and others discussing the club and Trump directly, which is evidence of contact and reputation, not incontrovertible proof of enrolled membership.
https://factually.co/fact-checks/politi ... hip-1b231c

Yep, Epstein shouldn't be trusted. But then again DonOld is also very well documented a serial liar.

Easy answer, release the membership paperwork.

Bet DonOld doesn't.

[O Really]

"As for Epstein and his opinion of Trump. He has little credibility. A certified low life."

Right on, but it's not like Trump has any credibility either, or is not also a certified (and convicted) low life.

[GoCubsGo]

References Sherlock Holmes The Hounds of Baskerville, the dogs that don't alarm because they're so used to the criminals.

[Vrede too]

"As for Epstein and his opinion of Trump. He has little credibility. A certified low life."

Right on, but it's not like Trump has any credibility either, or is not also a certified (and convicted) low life.

Jeffrey Epstein’s Brother Says Trump Is ‘Full of S–t’ After Email Release: ‘At What Point Is There Going to Be a Reckoning?’
“Every time he opens his mouth, he says something that isn’t true,” Mark Epstein says of the president

Jeffrey Epstein Victim Says Emails Claiming Trump Knew of Crimes Is Not ‘New Information to Any of Us’ | Video

Liz Stein, a survivor of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, said newly released emails from Epstein claiming President Trump “knew” about his criminal activities are nothing new to her or the hundreds of fellow survivors....

"hundreds"?

“I think that we have long established that Trump and Epstein had a close friendship, but now we’re seeing kind of a deeper dive into what that might have looked like,” Stein said. “I think that it’s important for us to remember that there were many high-profile men that were friends with Epstein, and I anticipate that we might see more information coming out also about them.”

Good.

... “It strikes me as odd that this was a campaign promise of the president and he has backpedaled on that,” Stein said. “That’s really concerning to me and it’s concerning to all of the survivors. We are victims of a crime and the crime was sex trafficking, and we just want this crime to be prosecuted in a manner that we deserve.

It's a detestable backpedal, but not "odd" for the TACO Liar in Chief at all.

“By our government’s own admission, this is a crime that victimized over 1,000 girls and young women, and I just don’t understand how we can let this go on,” Stein added. “I think this is an issue that has been highly politicized when it’s not a political issue whatsoever. … To politicize it at this moment feels particularly hurtful to the survivors.”

"over 1,000"? Guess I haven't been paying close enough attention.

... She subsequently pleaded with Republican lawmakers to “refocus and look at it from a more human lens about what was done to us, and who perpetrated these crimes.” ...

Hero. If they are ever forced to vote on the issue she just might get that.

I'm not going to bother sharing the SSDD quotes from deplorable bitch Karoline Leavitt that end the article, but there is no doubt that she's going to hell.

[O Really]

"... Victimized over 1,000..."
Without disrespect for those who were actually victims, I'm thinking this may be being Wood stocked. 400,000 attended but millions have said "I was there" through the years.

[GoCubsGo]

[Vrede too]

GoCubsGo

Jeffrey Epstein Victim Says Emails Claiming Trump Knew of Crimes Is Not ‘New Information to Any of Us’ | Video

Liz Stein, a survivor of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, said newly released emails from Epstein claiming President Trump “knew” about his criminal activities are nothing new to her or the hundreds of fellow survivors....

"hundreds"?

“By our government’s own admission, this is a crime that victimized over 1,000 girls and young women, and I just don’t understand how we can let this go on,” Stein added. “I think this is an issue that has been highly politicized when it’s not a political issue whatsoever. … To politicize it at this moment feels particularly hurtful to the survivors.”

"over 1,000"? Guess I haven't been paying close enough attention.

"... Victimized over 1,000..."
Without disrespect for those who were actually victims, I'm thinking this may be being Wood stocked. 400,000 attended but millions have said "I was there" through the years.

The question made me do the deep dive on Wiki that I had so far avoided. It was worse than I knew over more than 3 decades.

First criminal case (2005–2011)
Initial developments (2005–2006)

... Julie Brown's 2018 exposés in the Miami Herald identified 80 victims and located about 60 of them. She quotes the then police chief Reiter as saying "This was 50-something 'shes' and one 'he'—and the 'shes' all basically told the same story." Details from the investigation included allegations that 12-year-old triplets were flown in from France for Epstein's birthday, and flown back the following day after being sexually abused by the financier. It was alleged that young girls were recruited from Brazil and other South American countries, former Soviet countries, and Europe, and that Jean-Luc Brunel's "MC2" modeling agency was also supplying girls to Epstein, who actually financed the French agency.

Sex trafficking charges

... The search of his townhouse turned up evidence of sex trafficking and also found "hundreds—and perhaps thousands—of sexually suggestive photographs of fully—or partially—nude females". Some of the photos were confirmed as those of underage females....

The article also mentions a "network" of creeps, not just Epstein, his island and DonOLD. Eww. "over 1,000" may or may not be an exaggeration, but "hundreds" sure seems plausible if not proven. I'm going to go take a shower now, and I don't mean a cold one.

[Whack9]

Hey guys remember when Trump's DOJ and FBI said there wasn't a client list nor evidence warranting investigation into third parties:


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm2m879neljo

The US Department of Justice and FBI have concluded that sex offender Jeffrey Epstein did not have a so-called client list that could implicate high-profile associates, and that he did take his own life - contradicting long-held conspiracy theories about the infamous case.

...


FBI Director Kash Patel and his deputy Dan Bongino had previously questioned the official narrative regarding Epstein's death - although since joining the Trump administration, both have acknowledged that Epstein took his own life.

The memo adds that investigators "did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties".

So then why is he ordering his DOJ to conduct investigations all of a sudden, if those investigations "turned up nothing" and were already closed?

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj97x2lere0o

You'd think these guys would at least be able to keep their story straight, but instead it's whiplashing all over the place.

[GoCubsGo]

I don't understand.

They could've mispoke?

[GoCubsGo]

I'm old enough to remember this.