Billy Graham suggesting Mormons are a cult.

[blackfoot]

It was a theory when Darwin penned it, it's now established fact. You don't know this? Wow.

Maybe I shouldn't have used the word "theory", that would be raising Darwin’s idea to a level it doesn't’ deserve. I wouldn't expect you to understand this, goatboy, but there’s no direct, observable experiment that can ever be performed to legitimately call evolution even a theory.

The ideological heirs of racist Southern Dems are now registered GOP.

Not historically accurate there goat boy. Actually the Dems are still enslaving blacks, and whites for that matter, by the policies they put in place.

You must have been a classmate of lizard boy.

[perspctv]

First.. not all theories should be taught in school

So you don't want evolution taught in schools?

No - that is a central theory important to understanding the world ... like gravity. No one should avoid teaching it to salve your imbecilic religious sensibilities.

As for the end of slavery.. it was of course Liberals that led America out of that poisonous atmosphere.

Yes, the republicans did this, So now you are for the republicans?

They were cool in the 1860s ... we're we still in the 1860s and were they still as liberal perhaps we would. But they are nothing like that today.

[perspctv]

Maybe I shouldn't have used the word "theory", that would be raising Darwin’s idea to a level it doesn't’ deserve. I wouldn't expect you to understand this, goatboy, but there’s no direct, observable experiment that can ever be performed to legitimately call evolution even a theory.

Sure there is ... you just strap on your super-sized religious blinders and deny reality.

The ideological heirs of racist Southern Dems are now registered GOP.

Not historically accurate there goat boy. Actually the Dems are still enslaving blacks, and whites for that matter, by the policies they put in place.

You must have been a classmate of lizard boy.

What did he say that was inaccurate? You are a product of religious schools aren't you?

[Crock Hunter]

First.. not all theories should be taught in school

So you don't want evolution taught in schools?

Cheesus.. pussyfoot .. I almost feel embarrassed for you.. Outside of your quaint understanding of what makes for a scientific theory.. there is perhaps no other subject in all of science as well documented, as easily tested and as widely accepted as Evolution.. It is unquestionably the core of all modern biology.

I've encountered your misinterpretations before.. They are brainless droppings taken directly some pseudo-Christian tract . . It's rooted in the misconception that controlled experiments and the study of such experiments is the only accepted means by which to do science.. If we were to suspend reality long enough to allow for your "no direct, observable" stipulation then much of Astronomy is made invalid because stars cannot be recreated in the lab..

To hold that there are no "direct, observable experiments" that can validate Evolution reveals your incredible naive understanding of where learning originates..

As for the end of slavery.. it was of course Liberals that led America out of that poisonous atmosphere.

Yes, the republicans did this, So now you are for the republicans?

No... Liberals drove this change... but I can certainly believe that you're stupid enough to think that Quakers were Republicans.. ..

As for being "for the republicans" .. I've never been against Republicans.. It's simply that real Republicans have all but vanished from the American political scene... The party of Bill Buckley and Goldwater has been usurped by radicalized rednecks, racist renegades and know-nothing punks with black feet.. .

You know ..the way you mouthed off earlier.. briefly I expected more of a challenge out of you .. But instead you've provided yet another avenue for entertainment.. Now if I can just contain my giddiness as I wait for the next opportunity to shove more facts up your ass... .

you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.

Of course I do... Clearly, I'm handing you your ass and you are digging your hole deeper in the ground..

Over to you pussyfoot... that is if there's any ass left to back up your mouth.. ??

[O Really]

"The ideological heirs of racist Southern Dems are now registered GOP." Opinion, proof, or another pull from the orifice that you referred to in your post. Trend would indiucate the latter.

You're joking, right? Or maybe you're too young to have been around in the 50's or early 60's, or never read history or just like to pretend Vrede doesn't have facts right?

Look up "Dixiecrat" and you might find that part of their platform was:
"We call upon all Democrats and upon all other loyal Americans who are opposed to totalitarianism at home and abroad to unite with us in ignominiously defeating Harry S. Truman, Thomas E. Dewey and every other candidate for public office who would establish a Police Nation in the United States of America."

Sound a lot like anybody you know? "Socialist" screamers? Teapartiers? The poster formerly known as "nascar88"?

[perspctv]

Now if I can just contain my giddiness as I wait for the next opportunity ...

I know, right?

Usually most stupid adults have enough life experiences and have developed some appreciation of how challenged they are. Thus, they have learned over time to ratchet back their boisterous irrationality and self regulate a bit. To temper their words and offer narrow, constrained comments and views. Or alternatively to quickly slink away when discovered.

This dope clearly has no clue just how utterly asinine his views are. So with wild abandon and undeserving ego he trumpets his idiocy and flails about providing any and all ample opportunity to slap him about the face with reason and reality.

Did you read any of his other contributions on this thread?

[O Really]

Maybe I shouldn't have used the word "theory", that would be raising Darwin’s idea to a level it doesn't’ deserve. I wouldn't expect you to understand this, goatboy, but there’s no direct, observable experiment that can ever be performed to legitimately call evolution even a theory.

.

Well, maybe not "observable" since it took place over a 55 million year period (or at least 6,000 years if you're one of those), but it's pretty clearly an "evolution" of a horse... http://chem.tufts.edu/science/evolution ... lution.htm

How about selective breeding? You know that you may not be able to turn a cat into a dog, but you can certainly make a big difference in what kind of dog you get and what its characteristics are. Nevermind Darwin, you can read Mendel. If you can show that there are dominant and recessive genes, and you can show that characteristics of a given species can change drastically over time, based in part to gene transmission, and you can show that organisms change in adaptation to their environment, what else do you need? The only reason people deny evolution is religious-based.

[Bungalow Bill]

Spot the wingnut:


"Actually the Dems are still enslaving blacks, and whites for that matter, by the policies they
put in place."

[O Really]

Spot the wingnut:


"Actually the Dems are still enslaving blacks, and whites for that matter, by the policies they
put in place."

Yep, sounds a lot like the Dixiecrats...(above) "We call upon all Democrats and upon all other loyal Americans who are opposed to totalitarianism at home and abroad to unite with us in ignominiously defeating Harry S. Truman, Thomas E. Dewey and every other candidate for public office who would establish a Police Nation in the United States of America."

To say that anyone is "enslaved" today by governmental policy is to show a total disregard and lack of understanding of what "slavery" actually is, and a disrespect for those who were really enslaved. Sort of like comparing running your fishing boat aground to the sinking of the Titanic.

[Bungalow Bill]

It's just a variation on the old liberal "plantation" line, though now it looks like whites are
being "enslaved" too. Your typical wingnut ahistorical exaggeration. Just when you think
they can't get any crazier......they do.

Not that's it all that relevant, but it's hard to conceive of anybody further from a Dixiecrat
in appearance and demeanor than Thomas E. Dewey. The thought just brings a smile to
my face.

[blackfoot]

If we were to suspend reality long enough to allow for your "no direct, observable" stipulation then much of Astronomy is made invalid because stars cannot be recreated in the lab..

The make up of stars and planets are known and well documented, due to meteorite studies, therefore, what a star is made of has moved beyond "theory". Much like a man made diamond is created in a laboratory. Can't wait to read your juvenile response to this one, knowing how you probably understood this explanation.

Listen up CockHunter, I am growing weary of pretending like you are up to par and worthy to respond to. Either get some adult to help you out here, or go back to playing with yourself. Remember, everyone sees that you don't answer any question posed to you, at least not with a rational or educated response, so you are just taking up page space here.

Come back when you grow up son, you are outclassed here.

[blackfoot]

To say that anyone is "enslaved" today by governmental policy is to show a total disregard and lack of understanding of what "slavery" actually is, and a disrespect for those who were really enslaved.

Beholding to the taskmaster, sound familiar? Taking what the master allows you to have, sound familiar? Seems you haven't changed much since your "Democrat forefathers.

[Crock Hunter]

The make up of stars and planets are known and well documented, due to meteorite studies,

Things an idiot says.

I'll take "Nitwits" for $600 Alex. .. .

"due to meteorite studies," LMAO.. Determining the composition of stars has absolutely nothing to do with meteorite studies.. It is determined by Spectral Analysis... .




Gustav Kirchhoff is laughing at you from his grave..

what a star is made of has moved beyond "theory".

It never was theory.. . you're grasping pussyfoot..

Much like a man made diamond is created in a laboratory.

Actually ..it's nothing like "a man made diamond is created in a laboratory" .. In fact the two are so clearly unrelated one has to ask if you even understand the most rudimentary concepts of physics.. It's obvious you do not.

Can't wait to read your juvenile response to this one, knowing how you probably understood this explanation.

Well first.. you've offered no explanation for one to understand.. Second.. borrow someone's intellect and take a stab at debunking what I've posted using facts and data rather than the same hackneyed dodges..

everyone sees that you don't answer any question posed to you, at least not with a rational or educated response,

Actually, I'm sure that everyone sees that I have you by the balls and you begging me to let you out of this cage I've put you in...

You're in a difficult situation pussyfoot.. You realized a few posts ago that you're in way over your head and have become hysterical with anxiety.. You're being held up for ridicule and can find no way out of your predicament .. You and your fellow sufferers of chronic nitwit insult all human knowledge with your contempt for reality..

Just remember that there are those of us that see through your mindless religious prancing for what it is... an ever receding pocket of ignorance.

[O Really]

To say that anyone is "enslaved" today by governmental policy is to show a total disregard and lack of understanding of what "slavery" actually is, and a disrespect for those who were really enslaved.

Beholding to the taskmaster, sound familiar? Taking what the master allows you to have, sound familiar? Seems you haven't changed much since your "Democrat forefathers.

Same applies to coal miners and those in the former textile mill villages, but that doesn't make them slaves, except in the broadest of non-literal terms, like, "I'm a slave to my dog."

[bannination]

If we were to suspend reality long enough to allow for your "no direct, observable" stipulation then much of Astronomy is made invalid because stars cannot be recreated in the lab..

The make up of stars and planets are known and well documented, due to meteorite studies, therefore, what a star is made of has moved beyond "theory". Much like a man made diamond is created in a laboratory. Can't wait to read your juvenile response to this one, knowing how you probably understood this explanation.

Listen up CockHunter, I am growing weary of pretending like you are up to par and worthy to respond to. Either get some adult to help you out here, or go back to playing with yourself. Remember, everyone sees that you don't answer any question posed to you, at least not with a rational or educated response, so you are just taking up page space here.

Come back when you grow up son, you are outclassed here.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f6Z ... ARNEs/edit

This should take care of just about any and all arguments you have. "Dossier of Reason".

[blackfoot]

Well first.. you've offered no explanation for one to understand..

"One"..? That being you and your band of puerile morons. Why does that not surprise me lizard boy?

[Crock Hunter]

Well first.. you've offered no explanation for one to understand..

"One"..? That being you and your band of puerile morons. Why does that not surprise me lizard boy?

Looks like it takes about 30 hours for you to regrow that ass that I chewed off... . .

Stop by anytime you need for me to administer more of Crock's Patented "Fact" Suppositories..
Inserted rectally for rapid absorption by the Rightwing Brain...

[blackfoot]

It never was theory.. .

Time for another smackdown I see, ..... Star formation theory....theory of low-mass star formation....theory of competitive accretion....lower mass coalescence theory......theory of stellar structure .....etc...etc...


As always, I winced at your most recent babbling, what an embarrassment you must be not only for your family, but for the other buffoons on here that look up to you as their moronic leader.

[Crock Hunter]

No matter, it was not "meteorite studies" that determined the "make up of stars" and we have a planet here to ID its makeup, you moronic, embarrassing buffoon.

Take it easy on pussyfoot... those "Fact" Suppositories I gave him are wearing off... .

Looks like his head is further up his ass than I thought.. .

[Crock Hunter]

It never was theory.. .

Time for another smackdown I see.

Ok.. you do seem to have a taste for canvas..so I'm happy to enhance your education.. .

Star formation theory....theory of low-mass star formation....theory of competitive accretion....lower mass coalescence theory......theory of stellar structure .....etc...etc...
.

I think you need a few more "etc"s as NONE of those are theories of stellar composition.. as I correctly stated .. stellar composition was determined long ago by Spectral Analysis and has NOTHING to do with Meteoritics. . .

I winced at your most recent babbling,
.

Wince? That's just a common reaction to the application of one of Crock's Patented "Fact" Suppositories .. you'll get use to it...

..