Conservatism vs. progressivism

[Cannonpointer]

...ultraconservatives ... ultraconservatives ... conservatives... conservatives ...U.S. Rep. Stephen Fincher, R-Tenn.

Stupid deception, again. Those are not my words, they are Cynthia Tucker's:

http://blueridgedebate.com/viewtopic.ph ... 708#p30708

LOFL. You posted em, Nancy - and now you disavow them. What will you say the NEXT time I quote you calling repukes conservatives, tard-liar - and you DON'T have someone else to hide behind? Lofl. You are one predictable little hack, son.

[Cannonpointer]

To me,

To the rest of the world, the retarded excuses of a fourth rate thinker are not worth reading. So I skipped the rest. You're not here to honestly debate. Under no circumstances will we EVER see a hack like you say, "I didn't know that - I need to rethink my position in light of this new information."

You're somewhere between an ape and a homo sapient. Smarter than a dog, but less dignified. There used to be a place in this world for people like you, but concentration camps are no longer in vogue. When the revolution comes and I am made the Minister of Emigration, I have Tunisia earmarked as your destination. It's a nice enough place, but full of backwards retards. You and the rest of us will be happier for my decision - that's the way I roll.

[Cannonpointer]

The old, Bury them in Slobber stragedy. It's what I have come to expect from you, Vrede.

I will continue to respond to precisely what I choose. and you will continue to claim I am "running away from" whatever slobber I breeze past.

In the mean time, start reading up on the Ukraine, bub.

[Cannonpointer]

Yes yes, Vrede. You're chasing me all over the board. Your spam is unworthy, son. I'll continue to pick whatever I want from your long lists of lies, and ignore what I choose.

Just imagine, you tedious little man, if I responded to each and every tedious little break you make in every sentence of a post. And then you follow suit, and then I follow suit. Soon, each post would require a full page.

[Cannonpointer]

I keep being told my post is "forbidden."

[Cannonpointer]

It's what happens when you try to post a word or phrase that runs afoul of the spam filter. There are some strange ones identified here:

Forum not accepting certain articles/words.

To figure out the offender keep splitting your post in half and doing that again to the "bad text" half. Sometimes, you get it down to one word that's disallowed only when posted with any other word.

For example, try adding any word to the word in my next post.

Thanks.

Discussing sexual orientation, with little kids, is a sick, sick thing to do. They are androgynous and innocent and unready for such discussions. We simply MUST bring back the buggy whip to the public square.

Again, thank you for your courtly behavior. Now, go get my whip.

[Cannonpointer]

lol.

That other thread must have been bullying me, too - I was being "forbidden" in two different threads. I think it had to do with sex and small humans. Those phrases are filtered when they appear together, it appears.

I am glad I gave you mirth. I owe you some mirth.

[Bungalow Bill]

Some would indeed say that choosing government control over a woman's freedom
is not conservative. But most would consider that the more important factor is not
a woman's freedom, but the life of the child, which must be protected at all costs,
including that of government trying to restrict the right to abortion. That's the argument
that the majority of social conservatives would likely make.

And that's why a conservative state like Texas is trying to make abortions harder to
get. That's what conservatives do. Government control is a secondary issue. As Barry
'Mr Conservative' Goldwater was famous for saying "extremism in the defense of liberty
is no vice," in this case the liberty of a child to live.

[Boatrocker]

I'm not a Democrat. I'm an anti-Republican.

"You could say that I'm less a Democrat than an anti-Republican. I vote the way I do because I want the GOP to lose, lose badly, and keep losing until it comes to its collective senses, which at this point seems a very long way off indeed."

Well-said, Mr. Linker. Seemed apropro to this thread.