The homophobic thread :>

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Hey Banni...! That's neat! How'd you do that? I disabled my Adblock and logged back in.....you fed our cursors ExLax...they're poopin' little red plus marks! Move the cursor around in circles and shower the reply box with a thousand poopies!

I can type in y'all's screen names, move the cursor above the names and have a jolly ol time dumpin' on y'all! Don't take much to amuse me, ya know.

Oh well, fun while it lasted; back to Adblock.

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5638
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by bannination »

Mr.B wrote:Hey Banni...! That's neat! How'd you do that? I disabled my Adblock and logged back in.....you fed our cursors ExLax...they're poopin' little red plus marks! Move the cursor around in circles and shower the reply box with a thousand poopies!

I can type in y'all's screen names, move the cursor above the names and have a jolly ol time dumpin' on y'all! Don't take much to amuse me, ya know.

Oh well, fun while it lasted; back to Adblock.
Meh, can't take credit for it. Ripped off someone else's javascript code.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote:I have Adblock, the "glitter" is still there.
I have no "glitter" when I enable my adblock; it's only there when adblock is disabled.

You'll have to chastise Banni for that one... :D

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote: "Must be a different AdBlock version or browser. I applaud your successful glitter denial."
What part of "I've got the Super Doppler---Now! in High Definition!---Sky Watch-Sooper Dooper Plus version" did you miss? :lol:

So if I say I don't have glitter, I'm successfully lying :?:

If I recall, you also gloated over my not knowing how to get rid of the magnifying glass that apparently only you could see.

Maybe I'm a little techier than we both thought...or maybe I'm just a liar?

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote:Ummm, I didn't say "lying" . . . this time. Not all denial is conscious.

It's funny that you mention the magnifying glass. As is the norm I immediately admitted my error, something you almost never can manage to do. It's funny when your whines serve to highlight your own failings, it happens a lot.
:cry: :crybaby:

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by rstrong »

Ted Cruz? The guy who wants the federal government out of everyone's lives? Who doesn't want the "Washington elite" to have any power, leaving it all to the states? The one who just yesterday told a crowd that he was glad to be out of Washington and "back in America?"

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Mr.B wrote: "I have no "glitter" when I enable my adblock; it's only there when adblock is disabled."
Turned on my PC this a.m., logged in here, and there it was....Banni's glitter in all it's glory. I checked to see if my adblock was off; it wasn't. Cute.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote:
Mr.B wrote:
Vrede wrote:Must be a different AdBlock version or browser. I applaud your successful glitter denial.
What part of "I've got the Super Doppler---Now! in High Definition!---Sky Watch-Sooper Dooper Plus version" did you miss? :lol:

... Maybe I'm a little techier than we both thought....
Cute.
"... Maybe I'm a little techier than we both thought....".....or not.

User avatar
Boatrocker
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2066
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Southeast of Disorder

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Boatrocker »

Alabama's Top Judge: State Doesn't Have to Allow Gay Marriage

Stupid, backward, cracker-ass, baptist sunsobitches. I'm gonna start telling people I'm from Oregon.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23458
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by O Really »

Boatrocker wrote:Alabama's Top Judge: State Doesn't Have to Allow Gay Marriage

Stupid, backward, cracker-ass, baptist sunsobitches. I'm gonna start telling people I'm from Oregon.
They already handed this guy his ass over the ten commandments plaque, and he got elected anyway. I'm thinking they're getting ready to hand it to him again.

User avatar
Boatrocker
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2066
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Southeast of Disorder

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Boatrocker »

O Really wrote:
Boatrocker wrote:Alabama's Top Judge: State Doesn't Have to Allow Gay Marriage

Stupid, backward, cracker-ass, baptist sunsobitches. I'm gonna start telling people I'm from Oregon.
They already handed this guy his ass over the ten commandments plaque, and he got elected anyway. I'm thinking they're getting ready to hand it to him again.
Unless there is some provision to keep him from running again, the same stupid, backward, cracker-ass, baptist sunsobitches that re-elected him last time will just re-elect him again. This is the sort of redneck shit his fellow rednecks eat like candy.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Boatrocker wrote:Alabama's Top Judge: State Doesn't Have to Allow Gay Marriage

Stupid, backward, cracker-ass, baptist sunsobitches. I'm gonna start telling people I'm from Oregon.
Why don't you just make good on your word? Good-bye.

User avatar
Boatrocker
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2066
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Southeast of Disorder

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Boatrocker »

Mr.B wrote:
Boatrocker wrote:Alabama's Top Judge: State Doesn't Have to Allow Gay Marriage

Stupid, backward, cracker-ass, baptist sunsobitches. I'm gonna start telling people I'm from Oregon.
Why don't you just make good on your word? Good-bye.
'Bye. Don't let the screen door hit ya.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Boatrocker wrote:
Mr.B wrote:
Boatrocker wrote:Alabama's Top Judge: State Doesn't Have to Allow Gay Marriage

Stupid, backward, cracker-ass, baptist sunsobitches. I'm gonna start telling people I'm from Oregon.
Why don't you just make good on your word? Good-bye.
'Bye. Don't let the screen door hit ya.
:?:

User avatar
Boatrocker
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2066
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Southeast of Disorder

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Boatrocker »

Boatrocker wrote:
O Really wrote:
Boatrocker wrote:Alabama's Top Judge: State Doesn't Have to Allow Gay Marriage

Stupid, backward, cracker-ass, baptist sunsobitches. I'm gonna start telling people I'm from Oregon.
They already handed this guy his ass over the ten commandments plaque, and he got elected anyway. I'm thinking they're getting ready to hand it to him again.
Unless there is some provision to keep him from running again, the same stupid, backward, cracker-ass, baptist sunsobitches that re-elected him last time will just re-elect him again. This is the sort of redneck shit his fellow rednecks eat like candy.
Supreme Court Declines to Block Gay Marriage in Alabama
To borrow from Vrede: Tick-tock, all you redneck hater trash. Tick tock.
And someone step on this fucktard asshole of a state "Supreme" Court judge.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Boatrocker wrote: "To borrow from Vrede: Tick-tock, all you redneck hater trash. Tick tock.
And someone step on this f**ktard a*shole of a state "Supreme" Court judge."
I don't recall Vrede ever making a statement like that. He's a better person than that.

So what's your stake in this SCOTUS decision since you're in such a highly venomous, hate-filled mood?
"Alabama voters approved a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage in 2006."
What's the point in any state having law-making bodies if the SCOTUS says they have no right to make any laws; even if the voters approved such a law?

Funny thing here....more and more straights are shunning marriage and "shacking up" and popping kids out like rabbits. We the taxpayers are supporting those illegitimates through various government programs...yet "gays" are clamoring to marry....maybe they ought to just find out the secret to being a dead-beat just like their straight counterparts.

User avatar
Boatrocker
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2066
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Southeast of Disorder

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Boatrocker »

Vrede wrote: . . . Boatrocker, this may interest you or people you know . . . .
I actually do have some folks- in laws, actually- back in LA who are watching this and considering marriage. They are not even formally "out" yet, though it is an open secret and they virtually live together already. Long story. They have been avoiding any formal announcement due to redneck/fundamentalist/pentacostal issues in the family, and may just wait for some parents to die off before they do anything. Long story, for another place and time.
But, yeah, we are all aware and watching. We have already given them our encouragement and support. They are fine people.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23458
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by O Really »

Mr.B wrote: What's the point in any state having law-making bodies if the SCOTUS says they have no right to make any laws; even if the voters approved such a law?
The Supremes didn't say states have no right to make any laws. But states can't make any laws (including state constitutional amendments) that violate the US Constitution.

User avatar
Boatrocker
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2066
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Southeast of Disorder

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Boatrocker »

O Really wrote:
Mr.B wrote: What's the point in any state having law-making bodies if the SCOTUS says they have no right to make any laws; even if the voters approved such a law?
The Supremes didn't say states have no right to make any laws. But states can't make any laws (including state constitutional amendments) that violate the US Constitution.
Never teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig. The Notebooks of Lazarus Long
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

[color=#BF0000]Vrede[/color] wrote:
Mr.B wrote:I don't recall Vrede ever making a statement like that. He's better than that.

I agree with Boatrocker's post, and my language here has become less restrained since you've become way more vulgar, Mr.B. It's too late for you to be the Church Lady. Pick another drag queen (nttawwt) persona.
I guess I thought you were better than that; I got fooled. I can't pick another name; the name Vrede's done been took.

What's the point in any state having law-making bodies if the SCOTUS says they have no right to make any laws; even if the voters approved such a law?

Mr.B misses Jim Crow or, at the very least, learned nothing from its demise.
What's Jim Crow got to do with my question?

Funny thing here....more and more straights are shunning marriage and "shacking up" and popping kids out like rabbits. We the taxpayers are supporting those illegitimates through various government programs...yet "gays" are clamoring to marry....maybe they ought to just find out the secret to being a dead-beat just like their straight counterparts.

Funny thing here....Mr.B still opposes SSM despite part of their motivation being so that their children can be part of a more stable family unit.
I oppose homosexuality. If they want to "marry", that's their business. That still doesn't explain my comment above. Are you saying that illegitimate children can't be part of a more stable family unit??[/quote
Boatrocker, if your "in-laws" in LA want to marry, doesn't California give "gays" right to marry?

Post Reply