The homophobic thread :>

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

When did homosexuals become a separate race?

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

**
Last edited by Mr.B on Wed Apr 01, 2015 4:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23451
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by O Really »

Mr.B wrote:When did homosexuals become a separate race?
Careful, Mr.B - there are factors other than race that constitute illegal discrimination. Like religion, for example.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23451
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by O Really »

Maybe this question should be in "religion" but I've got a serious (at least in the context of of a forum) question: Why is a "sincerely held belief" that is called "religious" given more weight than a "sincerely held belief" that is not religious - like that the world is flat, or that rednecks shouldn't be allowed to breed?

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

O Really wrote:
Mr.B wrote:When did homosexuals become a separate race?
Careful, Mr.B - there are factors other than race that constitute illegal discrimination. Like religion, for example.
Homosexuality is a religion, then?

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

O Really wrote:Maybe this question should be in "religion" but I've got a serious (at least in the context of of a forum) question: Why is a "sincerely held belief" that is called "religious" given more weight than a "sincerely held belief" that is not religious - like that the world is flat, or that rednecks shouldn't be allowed to breed?
Or that homosexuality should (still) be illegal?

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23451
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by O Really »

Mr.B wrote:
O Really wrote:
Mr.B wrote:When did homosexuals become a separate race?
Careful, Mr.B - there are factors other than race that constitute illegal discrimination. Like religion, for example.
Homosexuality is a religion, then?
No, it's not. And it's not a disability. And it's not a national origin or a creed or color. But my point is that anything can be defined as a "protected group" from discrimination. Some, like age, disability, race, and homosexuality, are not under the person's control. Some, like religion, might be voluntary life choices. So even for those who ignorantly think homosexuality is a voluntary life choice, there is still precedent for protecting their rights as citizens. Just like religion.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23451
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by O Really »

Mr.B wrote:
O Really wrote:Maybe this question should be in "religion" but I've got a serious (at least in the context of of a forum) question: Why is a "sincerely held belief" that is called "religious" given more weight than a "sincerely held belief" that is not religious - like that the world is flat, or that rednecks shouldn't be allowed to breed?
Or that homosexuality should (still) be illegal?
Hard choice. If I were making the decision on making homosexuality illegal in exchange for making redneckery illegal, I just might go for it. Unfortunately, there are way more rednecks than homosexuals, so getting rid of the rednecks would be better for the society as a whole. Homosexuals could continue to stay in the closet, but for some reason rednecks seem to be compelled flaunt their redneckiness and stuff it down the throats of us civilized and well-mannered people. I probably wouldn't know if my accountant was gay or not, but I'm pretty sure I could tell if s/he were a redneck.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

:lol: :lol:

I dunno if rednecks outnumber "gays" or not.....but, I don't think that "redneckiness" is considered a wicked perversion or abomination.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23451
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by O Really »

Mr.B wrote::lol: :lol:

I dunno if rednecks outnumber "gays" or not.....but, I don't think that "redneckiness" is considered a wicked perversion or abomination.
Depends on who you ask. I think it is, and should be punishable by eternal fire in Hell.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

And these......fair-minded, open-minded, broad-minded, tolerant, unbiased, impartial.

A slang term, usually for a rural white southerner who is politically conservative, racist, and a religious fundamentalist ( see fundamentalism ). This term is generally considered offensive. It originated in reference to agricultural workers, alluding to how the back of a person's neck will be burned by the sun if he works long hours in the fields.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

O Really wrote:
Mr.B wrote::lol: :lol:

I dunno if rednecks outnumber "gays" or not.....but, I don't think that "redneckiness" is considered a wicked perversion or abomination.
Depends on who you ask. I think it is, and should be punishable by eternal fire in Hell.
How can that be? You don't believe there's a hell... :shock:
Or are you only wishing that on those who frown on the wickedness of sexual perversion?

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23451
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by O Really »

Mr.B wrote:
O Really wrote:
Mr.B wrote::lol: :lol:

I dunno if rednecks outnumber "gays" or not.....but, I don't think that "redneckiness" is considered a wicked perversion or abomination.
Depends on who you ask. I think it is, and should be punishable by eternal fire in Hell.
How can that be? You don't believe there's a hell... :shock:

Of course there's a Hell (upper or lower case) including the one in Michigan, and the hypothetical ones created as a place of misery. I'd send the rednecks to either of those, whether they're gay, straight, or bi.

User avatar
homerfobe
Ensign
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:37 am
Location: All over more than anywhere else.

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by homerfobe »

Let's look at this. We live in a world where armed terror groups wantonly kill anyone who opposes them or their so-called god. Not only in the Middle East but in Africa, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. There's young people from every nation and all walks of life scrambling to join in these groups to join in on the killing. Thousands of innocent lives are being lost not only to these brain-dead idiots, but to environmental issues that threaten the very existence of life on this planet. Toxic waste dumping, over fishing the oceans, air pollution, fouling the waterways and streams of the world with garbage and human shit. And what are we in the United States doing? Pissing and squabbling about some nasty ass faggot wanting to marry another filthy ass faggot or twat twinkie. We're pissing and squabbling because people who claim to be religious and believing that ass fugging is the lowest form of human deviation, are being castigated as bigots and haters of other humans. Demonstrations in the streets and so on. Yep, we in the US have really got our priorities in order. Verde or Vrede (whichever) says I'm obsessed. I've taken time to think about that. I am obsessed, obsessed with the eradications of queers. This world has enough pollution and garbage dumping without their adding themselves to the mix.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!

User avatar
Boatrocker
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2066
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Southeast of Disorder

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Boatrocker »

Latent.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

What Homerfobe said:

"Yep, we in the US have really got our priorities in order"


"I just did something really purposeful, and I'm really, really, proud of myself"

Losing a 200 grand job would make me purposeful and proud too...dummy. :shock:

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23451
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by O Really »

Mr.B wrote:What Homerfobe said:

"Yep, we in the US have really got our priorities in order"


"I just did something really purposeful, and I'm really, really, proud of myself"

Losing a 200 grand job would make me purposeful and proud too...dummy. :shock:
Loose cannon. Anger issues. Deserved to be fired. I'll bet those who worked with/for him were glad to see him go. I'll bet he was even a jerk at work.

JTA
Commander
Posts: 3898
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:04 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by JTA »

Mr.B wrote:What Homerfobe said:

"Yep, we in the US have really got our priorities in order"


"I just did something really purposeful, and I'm really, really, proud of myself"

Losing a 200 grand job would make me purposeful and proud too...dummy. :shock:
That guy's a fucking coward. Excuse my language but I feel it's pertinent in this case. Fuck him.

Sorry guys, I spent too much time working with jerk customers, probably gave me a minor case of PTSD.
You aren't doing it wrong if no one knows what you are doing.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

(Note: I don't know how this happened to get posted with the CFA link, but this was to be in response to Vrede's post.)

What Homerfobe said: "Yep, we in the US have really got our priorities in order"

He also said: "...people who claim to be religious and believing that (homosexuality) is the lowest form of human deviation, are being castigated as bigots and haters of other humans."

I don't "claim to be religious", I believe what the "cherry-picked" parts of the Bible say about mankind's disgusting sexual trysts, and yes, we are "castigated as bigots and haters of other humans"...however the supposed "hatred" that we are accused of is no different than the attitudes of those who curse God and our beliefs in Him. Man's changing of man's laws and constitutions doesn't alter what the Word of God has to say.

In essence, what homerfobe said is correct; the US should be more concerned about what our real priorities should be.
Last edited by Mr.B on Wed Apr 01, 2015 4:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5638
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by bannination »

Vrede wrote:
O Really wrote:Loose cannon. Anger issues. Deserved to be fired. I'll bet those who worked with/for him were glad to see him go. I'll bet he was even a jerk at work.
. . . and stupid enough to post a video of himself proving all of that while berating a female minimum wage worker who may not even be aware of or support Chick-Fil-A's corporate policies which, btw, softened considerably since Boss Cathy stuck his foot in his mouth.

Looks like Adam Smith - :D - just learned something about free markets in the digital age.
They may not mouth off as much, but they're still supporting organizations that are involved with the killing of homosexuals.

I haven't looked at their books, but I've heard their profits are up a lot year over year.

Post Reply