My guess is that we're more likely to see the ongoing butthurt fear and hatred that Spain has seen from losers like homerfobe and Mr.B than the mature acceptance and moving on that rstrong describes in Canada, but I hope I'm wrong. You nailed it. You're just guessing. Fga haters have lost nothing; we've just gained more faggots, cocksuckers, and twat twinkies. Now run along and play with yourself. In Canada they say God save the queen, I'm sure Canada has their share of queens just as any other country. Piss on the queen. (never mind, they'd love it)
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!
Overlooking the captions, the photos are a sad example of our nation's priorities.
It must be OK for our leaders to endorse sodomy by lighting up the home of our president with the colors of the Sodomites;
and ignore any similar celebration of our nation's freedom.
Something's bad wrong with that picture; dead wrong ...
O Really wrote: "Uh oh. I'm pretty sure I saw rainbow colors in those fireworks."
You saw what you wanted to see ...
I did say "similar" celebration, i.e., lighting up the White House with red, white, and blue colored lights.
I suppose our president has a differing view on which independence is most important ....
O Really wrote: "Uh oh. I'm pretty sure I saw rainbow colors in those fireworks."
You saw what you wanted to see ...
I did say "similar" celebration, i.e., lighting up the White House with red, white, and blue colored lights.
I suppose our president has a differing view on which independence is most important ....
I'm gonna try to play the devils advocate.
Gay marriage being legalized in all 50 states only happens once. Independence day happens every year. It doesn't seem as outrageous when you look at it that way, unless you're against gay marriage.
Do they light up the white house in red white and blue every year? Probably not, you know why? Because the white house would risk looking like a French flag (well, close enough anyway) and we all know America is the antithesis of those baguette eating, beret wearing, commie bastards.
You aren't doing it wrong if no one knows what you are doing.
JTA wrote:
"Gay marriage being legalized in all 50 states only happens (happened) once. Independence day happens every year." It's not totally out of the question that June 26th. would be made a yearly day of recognition, or even a holiday.
Time will tell.
"It doesn't seem as outrageous when you look at it that way, unless you're against gay marriage." "Gay" marriage is only part of the issue. The overall legalizing of sodomy is the biggest issue.
♫ "Rollin' downhill like a snowball rolling to Hell ..." ♪
JTA wrote:
"Gay marriage being legalized in all 50 states only happens (happened) once. Independence day happens every year." It's not totally out of the question that June 26th. would be made a yearly day of recognition, or even a holiday.
Time will tell.
Do you think we'll get the day off from work? Because if we do then I'm all about making it a national holiday, even though I don't think that's gonna happen.
If it becomes a national holiday, how do you suppose people will celebrate? Actually, I already know the answer. People will probably just sacrifice infants to the dark lord Satan.
You aren't doing it wrong if no one knows what you are doing.
JTA wrote: "If it becomes a national holiday, how do you suppose people will celebrate? Actually, I already know the answer. People will probably just sacrifice infants to the dark lord Satan." That wouldn't surprise me, given they're in his control; but it wouldn't last long. With the proliferation of "gays", there won't be any babies to sacrifice; and that does lead to an interesting question ... I wonder if Bruce Jenner has new plumbing inside? If he does, do you think the Bruce Jenners of this world will go "transgender" and start popping out those babies to sacrifice? They'd still get to keep their sexual preference, so the possibly isn't that far-fetched...
JTA wrote: "If it becomes a national holiday, how do you suppose people will celebrate? Actually, I already know the answer. People will probably just sacrifice infants to the dark lord Satan." That wouldn't surprise me, given they're in his control; but it wouldn't last long. With the proliferation of "gays", there won't be any babies to sacrifice; and that does lead to an interesting question ... I wonder if Bruce Jenner has new plumbing inside? If he does, do you think the Bruce Jenners of this world will go "transgender" and start popping out those babies to sacrifice? They'd still get to keep their sexual preference, so the possibly isn't that far-fetched...
If Satan demands sacrificial infants to feed his evil ways, but there are no infants to sacrifice because everyone became gay and got gay-married in this post gay-marriage world, does that mean gays are fighting Satan by starving the beast of his infant meat?
You aren't doing it wrong if no one knows what you are doing.
JTA wrote:
"If Satan demands sacrificial infants to feed his evil ways ..." Personally, I've never heard anything about Satan demanding infants for sacrifice.
"...but there are no infants to sacrifice because everyone became gay and got gay-married in this post gay-marriage world,
does that mean gays are fighting Satan by starving the beast of his infant meat?" I'm afraid that mankind, "gay" or straight, is no match for Satan. At any rate, what would be the point in attempting to fight the one who controls you?
JTA wrote: ". . . Do they light up the white house in red white and blue every year?"
No, but what was the point in lighting it up with rainbow colors? If the government can't "endorse"® red, white, and blue in celebration of independence, why should they be able to "endorse"® sodomy?
Boatrocker wrote: "Doesn't matter if you're a sour-assed old fundicongelical turd bucket."
Gosh, I bet you're so proud of yourself! How many times did you have to type those words of wisdom before you got it right?
JTA wrote: ". . . Do they light up the white house in red white and blue every year?"
No, but what was the point in lighting it up with rainbow colors? If the government can't "endorse"® red, white, and blue in celebration of independence, why should they be able to "endorse"® sodomy?
"Sodomy", whether "endorsed" or not, is not illegal in any state, the last law, in Texas, going away in 2003. Most see -and use - the rainbow symbol as representing equal rights, not an endorsement of sodomy. If "intent" or "personal meaning" matters in flying the battle flag of Northern Virginia, why wouldn't it also matter in flying the rainbow?
