Vrede wrote:"Oh crap, that lie again? You've defended the bigoted baker, photographer and wedding venue host."
What lie, goofy?
I tried to find an article I read earlier today that was written by a "gay" individual that stated he felt that the state of New York was wrong in fining a couple who owned a wedding chapel because they refused, on religious grounds, to marry two lesbians. He went on to say that that boiled down to bullying from the court, and on the part of the women wanting to marry, and that the couple's religious beliefs should be respected. Had he himself been turned down, he would have simply walked away and took his money elsewhere.
So what's wrong with that? Why do homosexuals feel that they have to bully their way into being accepted?
As I said, rstrong's linked article is nothing more than a frantic pity party designed solely to infuriate and incite hatred. Medical professions cannot refuse service to anyone. Major services and retailers have already changed their policies to accommodate homosexuals, and that's good; but homosexuals shouldn't be allowed to bully any small merchant to go against their religious beliefs. It's not like the merchants are "rolling in dough" and don't need the money.
I don't necessarily agree with the law, but homosexuals should realize that straights have feelings too, and not everyone is out to castigate them for their orientation.
Mr.B wrote:Oh goody! Does that mean you'll go away like a bad dream?
No, just that I'll tell the truth about your clear and unretracted advocacy for religious-based discrimination in retail goods or services - like with the bigoted baker, photographer and wedding venue host - without bothering to provide the links and quotes since you just run away like the dishonorable coward that you are every time.
It's your problem if your bigotry, lies and cowardice give you bad dreams . . . and it's your bigger problem if they don't.
Last edited by Mr.B on Tue Dec 09, 2014 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Vrede wrote:Oh crap, that lie again? You've defended the bigoted baker, photographer and wedding venue host.
Every time you've lied about your clear advocacy for discrimination I've posted the links. I'm tired of bothering, you just run away like the dishonorable coward that you are.
Aw, c'mon! It just wouldn't be a Mr.B post if he wasn't lying about or directly contradicting what he posted earlier!
Vrede wrote:Oh crap, that lie again? You've defended the bigoted baker, photographer and wedding venue host.
Every time you've lied about your clear advocacy for discrimination I've posted the links. I'm tired of bothering, you just run away like the dishonorable coward that you are.
Aw, c'mon! It just wouldn't be a Mr.B post if he wasn't lying about or directly contradicting what he posted earlier!
Aw, c'mon! It wouldn't be a rstrong or Vrede post if they weren't sniveling about some homosexual agenda.
You two eat, drink, and sleep homosexuals. (no pun intended)
So - Mr.B - imagine a world in which Christians were a minority, say 10% or so. And imagine that existing laws allowed (but not required) discrimination in employment and housing based on ones Christian faith. Imagine that Christians were not allowed to marry each other (although they could marry non-Christians). Imagine that in most states, an employer could simply say, "we don't want Christians around here... you're fired." Imagine that Christians could be refused service by retail stores and other public businesses, simply because of their faith. Hard to imagine? Sure, because religion is protected in the US. But what if? Would you still consider your efforts for equal rights to be "bullying"?
O Really wrote:So - Mr.B - imagine a world in which Christians were a minority, say 10% or so. It's coming.
And imagine that existing laws allowed (but not required) discrimination in employment and housing based on ones Christian faith. Imagine that Christians were not allowed to marry each other (although they could marry non-Christians). Imagine that in most states, an employer could simply say, "we don't want Christians around here... you're fired." Imagine that Christians could be refused service by retail stores and other public businesses, simply because of their faith. Hard to imagine? Sure, because religion is protected in the US. But what if? Would you still consider your efforts for equal rights to be "bullying"? Perversion and religion is hardly a comparison. Let's give all other sexual deviations equal rights too. Hard to imagine?
O Really wrote:So - Mr.B - imagine a world in which Christians were a minority, say 10% or so. It's coming.
And imagine that existing laws allowed (but not required) discrimination in employment and housing based on ones Christian faith. Imagine that Christians were not allowed to marry each other (although they could marry non-Christians). Imagine that in most states, an employer could simply say, "we don't want Christians around here... you're fired." Imagine that Christians could be refused service by retail stores and other public businesses, simply because of their faith. Hard to imagine? Sure, because religion is protected in the US. But what if? Would you still consider your efforts for equal rights to be "bullying"? Perversion and religion is hardly a comparison. Let's give all other sexual deviations equal rights too. Hard to imagine?
Perversion is sometimes in the eye of the beholder. There is at least a viable argument (whether or not universally accepted) that homosexuality is genetic, and not a choice. There is no such argument for religion, which is clearly, by any definition or standard, voluntary. But whatever - are you going to answer the question or not? What if Christians were the 10% minority and being subject to legal discrimination. "Bullying" or not?
O Really wrote:So - Mr.B - imagine a world in which Christians were a minority, say 10% or so. It's coming.
Probably. Although at about 75% majority in the US now, it will likely take a while. But you're right - the trend is less religion, not more. However, it's not the non-believers fault that people are bailing from the formal religions. It's the failure of the religions in regard to the people.
Mr.B wrote:... Let's give all other sexual deviations equal rights too....
After all this time "consent" still has too many syllables for Mr.B.
Interestingly, no "other sexual deviation" is in itself a disqualifying factor in marriage or employment outside of any illegal activity done. For example, a hetero pedophile can marry and get his wedding cake done, and can keep his job until or unless he gets caught actually molesting some kid. In contrast, a homosexual can be discriminated against not because of what s/he does or did, but because of what s/he is.
Mr.B wrote:"... Let's give all other sexual deviations equal rights too...."
"After all this time "consent" still has too many syllables for Mr.B."
You're right as usual..., ( 0:-?> ) it's time the 'age of consent' for kids to be abolished; it's time that laws dealing with sexual contact between adults, kids, and animals, and open displays of sex be done away with. After all....they're adults, and adults know what's best for them, right?
Vrede wrote:it's time the 'age of consent' for kids to be abolished; it's time that laws dealing with sexual contact between adults, kids, and animals, and open displays of sex be done away with. After all....they're adults, and adults know what's best for them, right?
It's time now for the homos, and their apologists, to join and support the movement:
Vrede wrote:it's time the 'age of consent' for kids to be abolished; it's time that laws dealing with sexual contact between adults, kids, and animals, and open displays of sex be done away with. After all....they're adults, and adults know what's best for them, right?
It's time now for the homos, and their apologists, to join and support the movement:
You're not taking something out of context again, are you?
And for inquiring minds, an "Indago" is a four rotor UAV drone manufactured by Lockheed Martin. Just thought I'd mention that.
