The homophobic thread :>

[rstrong]

Every time indago drops in to make a post:

[bannination]

Oh crap, that lie again? You've defended the bigoted baker, photographer and wedding venue host.

What lie, goofy?

This one:

Wear a cross or otherwise indicate that you are Christian and a non-Christian could refuse you goods or services. This is the world Mr.B has said that he wants.

Liar. Why are you so dishonest....or do you just miss me?

You even admit it's a lie when you post:

... homosexuals shouldn't be allowed to bully any small merchant to go against their religious beliefs.

It's not like the discrimination your applaud could only be practiced by Christians. Or, are you saying that only Christian merchants should get to be bigots?

... Why do homosexuals feel that they have to bully their way into being accepted?

Mr.B's direct ideological ancestors: "Why do blacks feel that they have to bully their way into equal access to retail goods and services?" Same bigotry, different victims.

... homosexuals should realize that straights have feelings too ...

Oh you poor, poor "frantic pity party" disadvantaged straights.

Now, if you want to discuss real persecution:

Governments turn up the heat on atheists: report

"danger to society...terrorists...capital offense...criminalized...deviant...a threat to society"

Yep, believers are the chief oppressors of both atheists and other believers.

I can see why governments would be worried, it's hard to get poor people to go fight for them if those same people realize once they're dead.... they're dead.

[neoplacebo]

for the point.

[O Really]

I can see why governments would be worried, it's hard to get poor people to go fight for them if those same people realize once they're dead.... they're dead.

Well, unless they're southern rednecks who happily vote against their own interest and support policies that hurt themselves as long as they think the blacks will be worse off.

[Mr.B]

"This is the America Mr.B has said that he wants."

Dishonest and condescending liar....and you bitch because you're misquoted.

Again....show me where I 'actually' said that

Seems you can dish it out but you can't take it........"takes a battle you'll lose"...

[Mr.B]

"The thread is still going, and while it’s not the most civil discussion on social media, most of the top comments are sweet stories of gay and lesbian romance."

Sweet stories...? good grief....you're really obsessed in this perverted homosexual mess, ain't you? Only you could describe "gay and lesbian romance" as "sweet".





Compare your "sweet" description to my neighbor's dog humping his favorite pillow every night before beddy-bye ....you would call that a "sweet romance" too?

[O Really]

I'll bet Mr.B could read a "sweet and romantic" story and find it just fine as long as he didn't know the names. The story is what it is, whether it's Jake and Jenny or Jake and Jack. Unless, of course one thinks that a homosexual is somehow sub-human. Oh wait...

[Mr.B]

"I did not write that, it's a quote from an article. Are you lying, again, or just incompetent, again? I see that in your obsession with gay sex you again state that "romance" is nothing more than "humping". Is your romance with Mrs.B limited to humping? I am glad to see that Spot has a sexual life other than what you do to him."
OK asshole.....where did I mention your parents in that quote? I told you to keep my wife out of your queer-obsessed bullshit. You didn't quote it, but you emboldened the print to make sure it stood out; so you must have agreed with the writer.

"For example, a Christian doctor who does not believe in a gay lifestyle would not have to treat a gay patient,"...

For example, an atheist or other non-Christian doctor who does not believe in the Christian lifestyle would not have to treat a Christian patient. This is the America Mr.B has said that he wants.

Dishonest and condescending liar....and you bitch because you're misquoted. Again....show me where I 'actually' said that.
Seems you can dish it out but you can't take it........" takes (corrected: that's a battle you'll lose"...)

I have not "misquoted" you, English much? I've stated the only possible conclusion from your reams of posts on the matter.
You're still a liar. I said to "show me where I 'actually' said that." Does "actually" have too many syllables for you? Or can you not understand English?

This is far different from indago's changing what I posted in a supposed quote box of mine. He has now been taught the lesson I taught you about integrity, one I'm pleased to note that you've learned, not counting your inability above to distinguish an article I've quoted from my own words. Thank you.
"The lesson you taught....." That's a laugh! Now you fantasize about your fabulous "teaching" skills?

You have repeatedly said that you endorse discrimination against gays in goods and services, just like was done to blacks under Jim Crow, liar. And, you repeated that wish on page 128 just after lying about never having done so. Many doctors are "small" businesspersons and most EMTs make less than most "small merchants", the bigots you're whining about supposedly being bullied.
Some cheese with your whine? JTA got your fries; maybe a few crackers too?

As you can see from the linked article, the Michigan law that your hateful ilk has proposed does not let just Christians discriminate against gays. Rather, it protects any bigotry based on "sincerely held religious beliefs."

Your incessant whining about "condescending" is a hoot. Most of the world thinks that condescension towards pitiful bigots and liars is warranted. You should be used to it by now.
The drama....oh, the drama....complete with condescending overtones and manipulation of words...yep, it's a hoot, and you wear your badge like a true trooper.

[Mr.B]

"I'll bet Mr.B could read a "sweet and romantic" story and find it just fine as long as he didn't know the names. The story is what it is, whether it's Jake and Jenny or Jake and Jack. Unless, of course one thinks that a homosexual is somehow sub-human. Oh wait..."

Oh wait...? First off, I don't care for romance stories, and I have not said, nor thought, that homosexuals are sub-human. Somewhere in this mess, you'll read where I said that humans are all created equal.

[O Really]

Oh wait...? First off, I don't care for romance stories, and I have not said, nor thought, that homosexuals are sub-human. Somewhere in this mess, you'll read where I said that humans are all created equal.

You may have said humans are all created equal, but you would be clearly mistaken. That concept of people (literally "men") being created equal applies only to "equal" under the law. A casual stroll through any Wal-Mart will easily disabuse you of the idea of innate equality. And no, you've never said specifically that homosexuals are sub-human. However, humans are obviously capable of love and romance. If the stories turn foul because they're about Jake and Jack instead of Jake and Jennifer, then a reasonable and logical conclusion is that Jake and Jack are missing some part of humanity.

[neoplacebo]

Oh wait...? First off, I don't care for romance stories, and I have not said, nor thought, that homosexuals are sub-human. Somewhere in this mess, you'll read where I said that humans are all created equal.

You may have said humans are all created equal, but you would be clearly mistaken. That concept of people (literally "men") being created equal applies only to "equal" under the law. A casual stroll through any Wal-Mart will easily disabuse you of the idea of innate equality. And no, you've never said specifically that homosexuals are sub-human. However, humans are obviously capable of love and romance. If the stories turn foul because they're about Jake and Jack instead of Jake and Jennifer, then a reasonable and logical conclusion is that Jake and Jack are missing some part of humanity.

Well, this "equal under the law" is a myth as well. Suppose you perpetrated some sort of fraud that netted you 25 thousand dollars and you're a standard redneck white trash nobody or even a standard low income black nobody. And suppose you're caught in this scheme and prosecuted.....you'd likely do time in prison. Now suppose you're a Wall Street bond trader or derivatives speculator and knowingly engage in a scheme that involves sweetheart deals and inside information and your own ability to work the system to your favor and this scheme nets you 75 million dollars. Even if you're "caught" or more politely "exposed" it's not likely you would even be charged with a crime, much less do time for it. Some are more equal than others but I didn't vote for that.

[O Really]

Nice concepts don't always translate well into reality.

[neoplacebo]

Every time indago drops in to make a post:

I just love this; it's as good or better than Stinger's running chicken for Col. Taylor. Priceless.

[Mr.B]

I told you to keep my wife out of your queer-obsessed bullshit.

"I told you what you need to do - admit that violating your own rule about keeping family out of our discussions was wrong (without any half-assed weaseling), request that the rule be reinstated and agree to abide by it".

And I'm telling you what to do....keep my wife out of these banterings.

If you think I'm going to kiss your ass every time you call me some half-assed stupid name, change what I say, or whine about me not admitting something, you're mistaken. You had no reason to mention my wife concerning that post, unless of course, you took my remark about homosexual humping being compared to a dog humping a pillow as a personal slam at you, well.....maybe you've got some confessing to do. Whether you're "gay" or not is none of my business and I really don't give a rat's rotten rump if you are, but you seem to be going off the deep end more frequently when homosexuals are slammed by either myself or Indago

[Mr.B]

"FYI. The dog humping described by homerphobe is dominance behavior. Has nothing to do with lust."

So now we know how dominance is determined in a homosexual "marriage" .......?? :gthumb:

[JTA]

My female shihpoo goes to town on her little stuffed teddy bear all the time.

[Mr.B]

"(it's not even a pillow, dummy)"

I'm happy that you took enough time to closely examine and study the gif...maybe you even picked up a few pointers; who knows?

[Mr.B]

I'm WARNING you the last time now Vrede, you smug son-of-a-bitch ,,,, you can be found. Stop it and stop it now.

You best just ease out of your taunt mode with no further comments concerning this post or your past posts.

You don't know anything about me or my past, but you're fixin' to find out what I can be capable of if you keep up your taunting..........

I am a Christian, but Christians, being human can go astray........

[Mr.B]

Ut-oh, Mr.B is now issuing direct threats, over my mentioning a pseudonym! I'm quaking in my boots.

Of course, I have nothing to worry about. Any "man" that cares so little for his wife or his own integrity that he can't admit (even anonymously!) that violating his own rule about keeping family out of our discussions was wrong and then request that the rule be reinstated while agreeing to abide by it doesn't have the balls to carry out his threats.

Again....You don't know anything about me or my past......I wouldn't be so smug if I were you.

If I "cared so little for my wife", I wouldn't be posting this, I would just let you wallow in your self-importance.... As I said, it's best to drop this here and now.

" I (sic) ask banni not to discipline or ban Mr.B. It's all too pitiful and entertaining to take seriously."
Am I supposed to bow now and grovel at your feet? You do what your all-important self has to do; I care less...oh.....and btw, I'm not threatening you, I'm promising you.

[bannination]

I don't know who's right or who is wrong in this argument, I've not followed it.

I do know that Mr. B is the one communicating apparent threats.

I hate giving anyone time out, so let me just say: Please STOP.

The next person that insinuates any physical threat is going to get at least a 1 week time out until they can grow up.

Mr. B, as a friend, I would strongly suggest you retract your statement. I am not a lawyer, but damn if you haven't made a really strong case against yourself if anyone pressed on it.

Crap, "Not threatening, promising?"

Gotta ban, no choice.