The homophobic thread :>

[O Really]

Boatrocker, if your "in-laws" in LA want to marry, doesn't California give "gays" right to marry?

Never heard of "Lower Alabama" Mr.B? Of course, that term sometimes applies to parts of the Florida Panhandle, too.

[Boatrocker]

. . . Boatrocker, if your "in-laws" in LA want to marry, doesn't California give "gays" right to marry?

Doesn't matter- they don't live in California. And shouldn't have to go there. And they don't have to, now. Religious haters lose again.

[Boatrocker]

Boatrocker, if your "in-laws" in LA want to marry, doesn't California give "gays" right to marry?

Never heard of "Lower Alabama" Mr.B? Of course, that term sometimes applies to parts of the Florida Panhandle, too.

Well, even in LA some folks are not eager to be lumped in with crazyass Floridians . . . .

[Mr.B]

". . . Boatrocker, if your "in-laws" in LA want to marry, doesn't California give "gays" right to marry?"

"Never heard of "Lower Alabama" Mr.B? Of course, that term sometimes applies to parts of the Florida Panhandle, too."
Is that a separate state from Upper Alabama?

"Doesn't matter- they don't live in California. And shouldn't have to go there. And they don't have to, now. Religious haters lose again."
"Religious haters"...? Hardly. Go back and read the majority of your spewings, then tell us who the real "hater" is, and what your hate is directed at.

"Well, even in LA some folks are not eager to be lumped in with crazyass Floridians . . . ."
Correct....California voted against SSM.....Florida said "come on down!"

[Boatrocker]

Oh, I am a proud religious hater. I hate religion with a passion. I'd not lose sleep if religion were driven from this planet, at the point of a bayonet, if necessary (though it would do no good in the long run). Never ducked or denied it. Of course, if religious busybodies would be content to practice their religion as they see fit and desist in their efforts to force their nonsense on everyone else by way of law, I might be moved to let go my hatred of them. But we both know that ain't gonna happen. And, no, no one is forcing gay anything on you- that argument is old, long-debunked bullshit.

[Mr.B]

"You ducked the point, your language here has changed dramatically. Why should anyone care about your whining when your own standards are so flexible?"
So...when did you ever care about my "whining"? My language only deviated one time and I've regretted it since.

"Ah, you're fantasizing that I'm a drag queen now. Whatever turns you on."
The fantasies...oh, the fantasies! Why....I could just faint! Ohhhhhh.....

"..... just as you bigots have lost now."
Oh, I know...tick-tock and all that. We're not worried about the "battles" we're losing in this world. This is just another victory for Satan's moral decay and total decadence.

"You have stated and never retracted that you oppose legalizing SSM. I've lost track of how many times you've posted the same lie about your own expressed position. If you've finally changed your mind just post, "I no longer oppose legalizing SSM."
What good would it do for me to oppose it? I'm only one person, and if millions of us "one persons" opposed SSM, it would do us no good because it's already been proven that our votes are useless. I said : "I oppose homosexuality; if "gays" want to marry, that's their business". However, SSM is homosexuality, therefore I oppose it.

"Were you saying that only the unmarried are deadbeats?"
Partially.. as a "single parent", that "parent" can reap all the benefits that the government bestows.

As you know, marriage is an oath that, though it can be broken, is both an expression of and incentive for ongoing commitment. Plus, it carries with it all sorts of legal and financial advantages for the partners and their kids.
Marriage was/is meant to be between a man and a woman. There can not be two wives or two husbands; two mommas or two daddys in a marriage. It is abomination and confusion.

[JTA]

[Mr.B]

That whine again? Unlike you, Boatrocker has never argued for hateful discrimination against any groups in law and policy.

That lie again...? Who said anything about groups in law and policy? I'm talking about what he said about those "baptist sunsa......" What is that if it's not hatred? Twist that some now.

"Years ago, all polls show that Californians now support SSM."
NOW...yeah. They don't have a choice. Oppose it , you'll get run out of business. Oppose it, you get a "gay" rights parade. The only reason they "support" it is because they're tired of all the whining and obscene displays.

Florida has not voted for SSM. Once again you screw up facts on a topic you're obsessed with.
Obviously, you've got all the facts, and stay on top of the latest... Now, who's obsessed? Oh....and what is the topic in this thread? Nothing but your favorite subject....homosexuality, right?

[Mr.B]

"Your gender confusion is not our problem."

If stupid could be fixed, someone would make a fortune on you.

I have no problem with my gender, do you?

I know my gender, I know who my Daddy is/was, I know who my Mom is/was, there were not two Moms or two Dads in our household; and my spouse is female...no confusion there.

"Wrong, it's biblically included polygamy, incest, and forced slave marriages......Wrong, multiple wives are common throughout the Bible."
...and always involved males and females......no women only, no men only. Stupid argument.

[Mr.B]

"Your hateful ilk is reforming or dying out, not that you'll ever admit it."

You've forgotten...I've admitted our "hateful ilk" is dying out but your ilk calls it "progress".

Thank God we have a better place not overrun with murderers, God-haters, whoremongers, sexual deviates, etc.

[Mr.B]

"If there is a God and S/He is a hateful, gay-obsessed bigot, you win."
So says the God-hating, gay-obsessed lover of perversion.

"If S/He is the compassionate, loving and tolerant God other Christians worship.... "
There's a price for being called a child of God...it's called loving Him and acknowledging that He is God. To love our brother/sister requires that brother/sister to love, honor, and believe in Him...

".....you'll be in the lake of fire right there with the Klansmen, rapists, Nazis, pedophiles, genocidal Serbian Christians and other haters"
"Other haters"...which includes you, Banni, rstrong, Boatrocker, sometimes lefty, Billy Pilgrim.......
not judging or anything, just saying what I see here. The church lady has spoken.... :violent:

[Boatrocker]

Confusion in Alabama after judges defy gay marriage ruling

Ahh, so many headlines begin with, "Confusion in Alabama".

. . . sigh . . . . this has gone so (relatively) smoothly in other states, as they were dragged closer to the 21st century. I guess if any state was gonna do it in such a fashion as to make Texass look sane, it was bound to be Kansas, Alabama, North Carolina or Florida.
Yay, Alabama. Glad I'm from Oregon.

[O Really]

Moore has a better than fair chance he'll get his law license suspended over this one, in addition to losing his phoney-baloney job. I don't know what the requirement for a law license in Alabama might be, though. It might just be being able to spell "laywer" without too many errors.

[Mr.B]

"Moore has a better than fair chance he'll get his law license suspended over this one, in addition to losing his phoney-baloney job. I don't know what the requirement for a law license in Alabama might be, though. It might just be being able to spell "laywer" without too many errors."

laywer.......?

"Says the one with the inside knowledge.... How many times did you struggle before you got it right?

[O Really]

"Moore has a better than fair chance he'll get his law license suspended over this one, in addition to losing his phoney-baloney job. I don't know what the requirement for a law license in Alabama might be, though. It might just be being able to spell "laywer" without too many errors."

laywer.......?

"Says the one with the inside knowledge.... How many times did you struggle before you got it right?

Was the joke a little too subtle for you, Mr.B?

[neoplacebo]

"Moore has a better than fair chance he'll get his law license suspended over this one, in addition to losing his phoney-baloney job. I don't know what the requirement for a law license in Alabama might be, though. It might just be being able to spell "laywer" without too many errors."

laywer.......?

"Says the one with the inside knowledge.... How many times did you struggle before you got it right?

Was the joke a little too subtle for you, Mr.B?

I myself have been a member of the "bar" for many years; in several states. And I've heard many cases in those venues, many of which had no merit. But I did my best.

[Mr.B]

"Was the joke a little too subtle for you, Mr.B?"

No, I got it. What with you being a lawyer and all, I figured this must be a test given before you can be a lawyer.....I merely asked how many times it took you to spell it right. It was a joke directed at your profession.....Comprehend much?

"Dubmass"

Comprehend much, dubmass?

[Mr.B]

Marriage was/is meant to be between a man and a woman.
Wrong, it's biblically included polygamy, incest, and forced slave marriages.
Even at that, it always involved a man and women/a woman. I've seen nothing about a man being married to several men, nor a man keeping men for slaves to marry later....strawman fail.

"And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

There can not be two wives.
Wrong, multiple wives are common throughout the Bible.
Not as one being the wife, being married to another woman. You knew what I meant, "moran". strawman fail.

or two husbands; two mommas or two daddys in a marriage. It is abomination and confusion.
Your gender confusion is not our problem.
"Our" problem...? You're a spokesman for everybody.....again?
So.... you didn't have an argument for that, so you just resorted to name calling. Typical. strawman fail.

Even if that were so, my personal "gender confusion" would have nothing whatsoever to do with that statement dealing with two husbands, two mommas, or two daddys in a marriage.

No where in the Bible does it make a statement referring to 'he and his husband', 'his husband', 'she and her wife', or 'her wife'..
The Bible states that no man that has more than one living wife shall be an elder (deacon) in the church....

[Mr.B]

I fixed the typo before you posted, dubmass.

I corrected it in my post. Didn't want everyone to see that the great Vrede make a typo. That's just more than the world can handle right now.
Besides, my calling you a dubmass was in reference to your agreeing with O Really; had nothing to do with your spelling....dubmass.

[Mr.B]

That's so stupid. I'm the one that immediately admits errors, you don't.
Yep...you're so perfect and all. Now....you want a medal, or a chest to pin it on?

Adam's DNA, it was Adam and Steve after all. Science.
Only in the mind of an idiot. God said to "be fruitful, and multiply".
Two of the same sex cannot multiply, nor did He say to be a fruit.

We all read your posts, and you're the only bigot here. Sorry that went over your head.
I doubt that. I'm only a bigot in the mind of an idiot, a liberal perversion-loving idiot at that.

Throughout the Bible there are references to multiple women engaged in a marriage, and one guy, which is socially more destructive than anything you can say about SSM.
Key words..."one guy".

Show me a reference where there's a woman with multiple wives; or a man with multiple husbands.
Lousy twist attempt you've got there.....fail.

II doubt seriously that polygamy is "socially more destructive than anything you can say about SSM". Homosexuality is a sexual deviation from normal human relations.