The homophobic thread :>

[Mr.B]

*sigh* Another day, another instance of Mr.B writing something offensive and stupid and being unable to defend it.
I'm only attempting to speak what you can understand; I'm trying not to go too far over your heads.

So you speak only in pathetic dodges and lame cop-outs. Right. Gotcha.

Since that's the height of your intelligence and ability to understand, yes.

[bannination]

Illiterate again, plenty wwt.
"Again"...? When did you get over your first bout of illiteracy?

*sigh* Another day, another instance of Mr.B writing something offensive and stupid and being unable to defend it.
I'm only attempting to speak what you can understand; I'm trying not to go too far over your heads.

As usual, you have no balls when proven wrong.
Seems you and Boatrocker both have this affinity for "balls". Obsessed

If we chose to interpret that the way some Christians choose to interpret their own crap, it clearly says that only men have marriage rights. :gayhappy: Fabulous!
If you're so upset that you didn't marry a man, :gayhappy: divorce the little lady you're married to now (if it is a she) and go pay billy.p or Boatrocker a visit. I'm sure either would welcome you with open arms. I didn't mention rstrong as a possibility, because it's too cold in Canada, and I wouldn't wish him or his environment on anybody. I didn't mention Vrede because he considers himself above anyone else's intelligence level.

I've got more sense than the five of you combined, and I ain't got a damn lick of sense.

You all were born during low tide in the gene pool proving there is such a thing as evolution after all....only thing is, it's going backwards for you.

I stand up for the rights of gays, and you think I gay. I guess I'm a nigger lover too.

[Mr.B]

"I stand up for the rights of gays, and you think I gay. I guess I'm a nigger lover too."

Your words...you tell us. Judging from your post, I thought you were laying down "for the rights of gays".

I didn't say I thought you were "gay", you posted the little "gay" emoticon thingy; I thought that might be a hint. You gonna try & find an emoticon for a "n..... lover" now?

[neoplacebo]

Not sure if this should be here or in the religion or wingnutties out of control threads, but the Alabama Supreme Court today blocked same sex marriage in the state, in violation of the federal court ruling that the state's ban is unconstitutional. Looks like trouble coming down the line.

[Mr.B]

Times-News Poll:

Do you think transgendered people should be able to use the
bathroom in which they feel most comfortable?

Yes: 22%
No: 65%
Unsure: 13%

Number of votes cast: 352

[Mr.B]

.... In their wisdom the founders set up SCOTUS to interpret the Constitution and it unanimously said marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man". As usual, you have no balls when proven wrong. 2 pages of your running away from your screw up.

"IT" being the SCOTUS' interpretation, dubmass. Regardless of what the airheads of SCOTUS "interpret" it's still not in the Constitution.
You screwed up again.

However, to keep your egotistical, condescending bubble intact, here's this:
For the record, the Supreme Court has found that the right to get married is in the Due Process Clause (see Loving v. Virginia, 1966) and in the Equal Protection Clause (see Zablocki v. Redhail, 1978).

[O Really]

Here's an example, Mr.B -
The Fourth Amendment text says, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

So - is an electronic scan a "search?" It's not mentioned "in the Constitution" but most would agree that it's a question that should be answered. Who can answer it? Only the Supreme Court - so says the Constitution directly. And when the Supreme Court answers? It's as much a part of what is Constitutional as the original content itself.

The Supremes do sometimes make decisions that many may disagree with and sometimes have sound legal reasoning against (like every one that is a 4-3 split, for example) but once made, it is indeed the law of the land.

[neoplacebo]

Mormon church backs Utah LGBT anti-discrimination bill

The Mormons, the Pope, many Jews, Many Protestant sects - Who will be last in America, Muslims or the Baptists?

Baptists.

[rstrong]

*sigh* Another day, another instance of Mr.B writing something offensive and stupid and being unable to defend it.
I'm only attempting to speak what you can understand; I'm trying not to go too far over your heads.

So you speak only in pathetic dodges and lame cop-outs. Right. Gotcha.

Since that's the height of your intelligence and ability to understand, yes.

And still, surprising no-one, he's unable to defend his claim.

[billy.pilgrim]

.... In their wisdom the founders set up SCOTUS to interpret the Constitution and it unanimously said marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man". As usual, you have no balls when proven wrong. 2 pages of your running away from your screw up.

"IT" being the SCOTUS' interpretation, dubmass. Regardless of what the airheads of SCOTUS "interpret" it's still not in the Constitution.
You screwed up again.

However, to keep your egotistical, condescending bubble intact, here's this:
For the record, the Supreme Court has found that the right to get married is in the Due Process Clause (see Loving v. Virginia, 1966) and in the Equal Protection Clause (see Zablocki v. Redhail, 1978).

the right to eat crap at mcdonalds ain't in the constitution

[bannination]

Found Vrede!!


Put it here because Mr. B. no doubt thinks male nurses must be gay.

[bannination]

I would wonder about a guy that was so fussy about his beard and chose to shave his head. It looks like his ear is about to be bitten off, let's call him "Evander".

I'm not sure those aren't MD students, though the gender disproportion is unusual. Nurses can wear white coats, but it isn't the norm.

They're nurses, I think it was a graduation type picture.

[neoplacebo]

I would wonder about a guy that was so fussy about his beard and chose to shave his head. It looks like his ear is about to be bitten off, let's call him "Evander".

I'm not sure those aren't MD students, though the gender disproportion is unusual. Nurses can wear white coats, but it isn't the norm.

They're nurses, I think it was a graduation type picture.

I really like that one with the glasses up on the left; makes me want to be injured.

[Mr.B]

Found Vrede!!
Put it here because Mr.B. no doubt thinks male nurses must be gay.

You said that, not me...however the guy in the photo doesn't appear to be happy about being in mixed company.....good indication of your assumption. (maybe he's "confused" about his gender and is wondering if he should even be in the photo )

[bannination]

I would wonder about a guy that was so fussy about his beard and chose to shave his head. It looks like his ear is about to be bitten off, let's call him "Evander".

I'm not sure those aren't MD students, though the gender disproportion is unusual. Nurses can wear white coats, but it isn't the norm.

They're nurses, I think it was a graduation type picture.

I really like that one with the glasses up on the left; makes me want to be injured.

We shall bring them to you state room sir. Would you prefer one at a time or all at once?

[Mr.B]

My friend was an infantry marine, now he is a nurse. I did a reverse image search before posting but got zero results.

Reading some of those posts was a stark reminder why I don't post in social media. Trash.

[neoplacebo]

I would wonder about a guy that was so fussy about his beard and chose to shave his head. It looks like his ear is about to be bitten off, let's call him "Evander".

I'm not sure those aren't MD students, though the gender disproportion is unusual. Nurses can wear white coats, but it isn't the norm.

They're nurses, I think it was a graduation type picture.

I really like that one with the glasses up on the left; makes me want to be injured.

We shall bring them to you state room sir. Would you prefer one at a time or all at once?

Just the brunette, fourth one up on the left. Carry on. Perhaps the raven haired beauty below the first another time.

[Mr.B]

... I don't post in social media. Trash.

He says with a post in social media.

Nothing here like it is there; I ignore the smattering of trash here. Popular social media sites are cesspools of vulgarity frequented by those who's own self-esteem can be questioned.

[Mr.B]

True, but you've gotten pretty trashy and vulgar of late, and your obsession with gays calls into question your own self-esteem.
Speaking only what you understand...."obsession" is your terminology; fantasies from your obsessed mind. I'm comfortable with my self-esteem. Sorry you can't say the same; if you were you wouldn't be the condescending (fill in as desired) that you are.

Tick-tock.
Big whoopee-doo. Winning battles is far from winning the war. God will have the last Word.

As someone (rstrong?) here has posted, it won't be long before the GOP claims to have always supported equality, perhaps as early as 2016.
Well.....they want to be re-elected, don't they? Obama did the same thing; got him re-elected. They learned from the top.

It's a little akin to Mr.B whining that he doesn't hate gays while repeatedly calling them perverted abominations and arguing for their being treated with less than equality in numerous ways.
LIAR! I've never called THEM perverted abominations; and I haven't argued they should receive any such treatment. You'll so full of male bovine excrement...oh, excuse me...you prefer it be called bullsh*t...I forgot. Please forgive me.

[Mr.B]

Gays being your prime forum interest makes them your obsession. It's adorable that you deny it.
"Gays" being your prime forum interest makes them your obsession. It's adorable that you deny it and accuse others of being obsessed with the subject. BTW...the name of the thread deals with......?

If you were more comfortable with your sexuality you wouldn't care what other loving couples do. Face your low self-esteem.
Dude...I've been married to the same woman for 47 years. Now...how long have you been married?
"Loving couples"...that's a laugh when you consider you're speaking of two of the same sex.

True, I'm condescending towards bigots, as are most of the nation and all decent folk. You're the indecent, abnormal one.
Awww...crrryy me a riv-vver. That whine again? Sure, I'm the "abnormal, indecent one"... uh-huh.

What did Obama claim credit for believing that he really had never believed? It's funny when you make shit up.
Ohhhh...getting testy ain't we? BHO suddenly decided he was all for SSM; of course it was re-election time.

LIAR!, as usual.

... abomination ...

... perverted ...

I said that was their lifestyle, comprehend much?

And, you've argued many times for gays being treated with less than equality in marriage, employment and retail goods and services. "You'll (sic) so full of" bullshit. Why do you lie about the same thing over and over and over? It's pitiful.
Opps...missed that misspelling. That's OK, I can still use it; thanks for pointing it out. "You're so full of" bullsh*t, "You'll always be so full of" bullsh*t, You'll never live down being full of bullsh*t.....oh, the possibilities!

As far as your obsessive whine about my arguing for what you say I do, you're even more full of b.s. I said an employer has the right to hire and fire who he/she pleases even if being "gay" was the reason. That remark sent you over the edge and you still obsess, pizz and fume over it. Get over it little child.

Aren't you glad we had this quality time together? Where else would the others get their entertainment if you and I weren't going at each other's throats all the time?