The homophobic thread :>

[bannination]

As far as your obsessive whine about my arguing for what you say I do, you're even more full of b.s. I said an employer has the right to hire and fire who he/she pleases even if being "gay" was the reason. That remark sent you over the edge and you still obsess, pizz and fume over it. Get over it little child.

OH please, you'd pitch an unholy fit if a business fired you for being straight or being a Christian. You only believe that bullshit because you happened to not be discriminated against.

[Mr.B]

That's a lie, again. That's a lie, again. I've always admitted being obsessed with equality and tolerance,
and this is the major struggle for it at the moment. Why are so dishonorable that you make shit like that up? :cussing:

Every reader here already knows the truth.
You've got that right...everyone here knows how full of you are.

Any discussion here of gay sex is your obsession.
You're the one who's "always admitted being obsessed"....the subject is about "gays", your favorite subject, isn't it?

...though I get that you choose to only see gay men as sexual objects, hmmm. Damn you're stupid and hateful.
Why else would a man declare to be "gay" if he wasn't indulging in "gay" sex? Damn, you're stupid....and hateful.

(This is your cue to be so stupid as to lie and whine that you hate no one as if this post of yours isn't a expression of your bilious hate. You just don't have the stones to admit that it's hate and how unChristian that makes you.)
(obsessed with balls again) Hating an activity is far from hating the person; or haven't you got the brains to figure that out? You don't need a cue to be stupid, it comes naturally to you. Like I said before, if someone invents a cure for stupid, they'd make a fortune off you.

Hardly. You lie, I point it out.

The subject of your lie doesn't matter that much to me.
Not much in life matters to you anyway, except pitching a fit when someone dares to bad-mouth one of your life's favorite things.

"lifestyle" is another cowardly hairsplitting lie meant to cover both for your just having been caught lying about abomination and perverted and to cover for your clear hatred of gays.
According to your wee, little, one-track mind. I never lied about "abomination and perverted", homosexuality is exactly that; and you are so blind with your "gay", radical, activism that you can't see beyond anyone else's opinions. Your only self-defending whine is anyone who disavows homosexuality, "hates gays"

It's no more a "lifestyle" than being straight is and you know it. Why are too delicate to admit obvious lies you post? .
Of course it isn't, stupid! It is a perverted lifestyle though; and I just "admitted" it again!

Every reader here already knows it
Trying to convince yourself?

Plus, you've also called for gays to be denied certain jobs,
"Certain jobs" being those that dealt with "gays" being around kids; such as a "queer or lesbian" scoutmasters, teachers, etc.
I still support it; deal with it.

and you oppose marriage equality and equality in access to retail goods and services, just like the filthy racist defenders of Jim Crow.

All these add up to "you've argued many times for gays being treated with less than equality in marriage, employment and retail goods and services." Why are so dishonest as to keep denying it? Every reader here already knows you cheerlead for inequality.
Get over it little child.
Aren't you glad we had this quality time together? Where else would the others get their entertainment if you and I weren't going at each other's throats all the time?

Bigots, liars and cowards get challenged.

If you hadn't led such a sheltered redneck life you would be used to it.
I shudder to think about the life you led.

[homerfobe]

Hey ya'll, miss me? Let's go back to where we left off.
Q: What did one faggot say to the other faggot at the gay bar?
A: Can I push your stool in?

Q: What are the first symptoms of AIDS?
A: A pounding sensation in the asshole.

Vrede, you blowflies are still at it. Who would have thought that? Yes I called you blowflies because that's exactly what you are. A bunch of filthy faggot hunting blowflies. You smell a stinking faggot and you've got to run and embrace the nasty sonofabitch then castigate anyone who should speak out against their sub-human filthy-ass lifestyle.
The object of your hateful shit right now is accused of being a secret queer because he rightfully believes that faggotry is a perverted lifestyle. Not only the accusations, but you badmouth his wife, his religious beliefs, accuse him of being ignorant and a redneck, while pissing about gay rights. Gays ain't got no fucking rights you imbecilic moron. I don't care for what he does, but I don't grief him over it. Pissing ya'll off about fags is more fun.
O Really, I CAN call you faggot-huggers, and you can call me a nigger-lover. I am a nigger-lover. Maybe you forgot when I told you I was a nigger myself? And a damn proud one. I don't think faggotry is a sin, it's a rotten perversion born out of the depths of hell and you fag-huggers think it's something cool and neat. Horseshit!
rstrong and Verde, you criticize Mr. B because he's sincere in his religious beliefs and you are just being the atheist assholes you are. You may be learned individuals, but you don't have a damn clue what common sense is. If you did, you (and your buddies above) wouldn't think it's normal for a man to fuck another mans asshole or suck his dick. "Equal rights" is pure stinking horseshit. You don't see normal people going around shrieking that they want equal rights to suck dicks and lick assholes. If that's being hateful and bigoted, tough shit. Don't be such a whiney-assed crybaby.

As far as any religious interpretation, I think I discovered the religion you and your ilk believe in.
Once upon a time, in a swamp far, far away, a gelatinous ball of slime got tired of living alone in a smothering stinking swamp and crawled out on dry land. Lying in the warming sun, he soon dried out and found that if he stretched enough, he could change his shape. He grew legs and arms and found that if he stretched enough, a part of him would break free. In doing this he created himself a mate, and decided to make it into an opposite of himself. He called it a female and called himself a male. Over the centuries, the descendants of the male and female began to tire of each's mates and sought out other forms of pleasure. Since there weren't enough females for the males, they turned to each's own gender for sexaual pleasures. Assholes became male vaginas, penises became lollipops, female vaginas and assholes became soup bowls, and whatever could be imagined in their minds was open for their pleasure.
From the dunghills of their waste, came a new race; a race that took a look around and decided that these poor worthless pieces of shit needed protection from what would eventually become persecution from those who looked down on such behavior. They called themselves liberals, gay-rights activists, and eventually became known to the decent world as blowflies.
And that is just the beginning. You're welcome.

[bannination]

Hey Mr. B, in order to try a different tact, what *would* change your mind about gay marriage?

[Mr.B]

"Hey Mr. B, in order to try a different tact, what *would* change your mind about gay marriage?"

Where've you been? I've said before that if "gays" want to get married, that's their right under the law and it's none of my business.
What part of "I believe homosexuality is un-natural and is condemned by God" are you all having such a hard time in getting into your minds? Simply put, they're humans; they have basic human rights just as I do, I just find their attraction to one another, sexually or physically is an abomination in the eyes of God despite what man has attempted to change.

[Mr.B]

"[............]"

Good grief Homer; tell us how you really feel. Leaving the vulgarity out, your theory of evolution could be funny, despite the graphic descriptions!

I don't know whether to say 'thank you' or say 'MYOB' re the comments about me. In this world of God-hating, radical, free-thinkers, that kind of attitude is common simply because of a religion-based belief on the part of the one on the receiving end.

The fact that you're so outspoken and vehement floors even me. You really ought to ditch that attitude despite the fact I love seeing the whiners here squirm.

You claim no religion, yet you state you despise homosexuality as well as the homosexual. According to the God-haters here, that's not supposed to happen. Either you're "with 'em or you're a'gin 'em".

[bannination]

"Hey Mr. B, in order to try a different tact, what *would* change your mind about gay marriage?"

Where've you been? I've said before that if "gays" want to get married, that's their right under the law and it's none of my business.
What part of "I believe homosexuality is un-natural and is condemned by God" are you all having such a hard time in getting into your minds? Simply put, they're humans; they have basic human rights just as I do, I just find their attraction to one another, sexually or physically is an abomination in the eyes of God despite what man has attempted to change.

Wait, so you'd knowingly vote for a candidate that supported gay marriage?

[O Really]

Welcome back, Homo - we've all missed your wisdom.

So we know how you feel about homosexuals. No need to keep yammering obscenely just to show you're well educated enought to spell "fag." Do you have an opinion on the topic most of the rest of us are discussing - whether homosexuals should be denied civil rights just because they're "unnatcheral" "despicable", "abomination of God", "yucky" or whatever?

[Mr.B]

"Wait, so you'd knowingly vote for a candidate that supported gay marriage?"

Generally, I don't vote any more. "Gay" marriage, abortion, the price of gasoline, the price of eggs in China, what people are wearing to Wal-Mart, and all that crap that gets slung into the faces of political candidates has very little interest to me.

All I can say is, if a candidate wants to be elected/re-elected, he/she best be aligned with what's on people's minds; they're in it for the money and prestige anyway.

[O Really]

...
All I can say is, if a candidate wants to be elected/re-elected, he/she best be aligned with what's on people's minds; they're in it for the money and prestige anyway.

I'd agree with you that at my age, I don't get as excited about things I have no impact on as I might have years ago when I thought I wore silver armor. But I disagree that most people who go into politics do it for "money and prestige". For one thing, you usually have to already have a lot of money just to run. Most members of Congress take a pay cut to serve there. Prestige is a little vague at least in the House, also, with an overall 15% favorability rating and a lot of people like yourself thinking they're all scumbags. Most start out wanting to make a difference for what they see as the best interest of the country. But getting elected requires money, which requires ass-sucking and appealing to people you might not invite to dinner IRL. Then when you're in office, you have people standing on line to give you money if you support this or that and threatening to turn their whole (association, church, union, yada) against you if you don't. It's a pretty dirty process, but I don't think it's because all the people involved are inherently evil.

[Mr.B]

Control freaks would be a better description.

Elected offices were supposed to be an opportunity where the average dirt farmer could have the opportunity to have a say-so in government. Like everything else, money, strife, and greed took over the election process to the point that only the wealthy, wishing to be wealthier and having control, can afford to hold an elective office; and as long as they support whatever ding-bat cause comes along, they're assured of continued re-election. it's unfortunate that so many states don't have term limits for lawmakers, senators, etc.

[O Really]

Control freaks would be a better description.

Elected offices were supposed to be an opportunity where the average dirt farmer could have the opportunity to have a say-so in government. ....

May be, but even from the start, most people in government weren't "average dirt farmers." Probably a good thing. I don't know about you, but I'd rather not have the "average dirt farmers" in charge. Of course, as compared to the teapartiers, maybe the "average dirt farmers" would be an upgrade.

[Mr.B]

OK...average citizen then; occupation wasn't important as long as they were known as responsible citizens.
I used the farmer as an example only.

I saw this tid-bit of information years ago when I was in school; don't recall where.
(I added this note in case someone ( ) challenged me on my source of information.)

[O Really]

OK...average citizen then; occupation wasn't important as long as they were known as responsible citizens.
I used the farmer as an example only.

I saw this tid-bit of information years ago when I was in school; don't recall where.
(I added this note in case someone ( ) challenged me on my source of information.)

Understood. I wasn't really picky on semantics. But I've got nothing against plumbers, painters, accounting clerks, admin assistants, lower middle managers, yada, but I wouldn't want a Congress-full of them to be in charge, either. By definition, a (lower case) "representative" is a leader-type person. Issues are complicated, and they're making laws the rest of us have to live by. A big part of the problem now isn't that there are no dirt farmers, it's that the incumbents try to oversimplify and don't bother to do the analysis to see the real story. Too wrapped up in the politics to bother with fact.
Drives me nuts when somebody starts out saying, "the solution is really simple, we just..." No, I want thinkers in government. I want educated people who have a sense of "big picture." Of course, I want to win Power Ball, too, and that's more likely.

[JTA]

OK...average citizen then; occupation wasn't important as long as they were known as responsible citizens.
I used the farmer as an example only.

I saw this tid-bit of information years ago when I was in school; don't recall where.
(I added this note in case someone ( ) challenged me on my source of information.)

Understood. I wasn't really picky on semantics. But I've got nothing against plumbers, painters, accounting clerks, admin assistants, lower middle managers, yada, but I wouldn't want a Congress-full of them to be in charge, either. By definition, a (lower case) "representative" is a leader-type person. Issues are complicated, and they're making laws the rest of us have to live by. A big part of the problem now isn't that there are no dirt farmers, it's that the incumbents try to oversimplify and don't bother to do the analysis to see the real story. Too wrapped up in the politics to bother with fact.
Drives me nuts when somebody starts out saying, "the solution is really simple, we just..." No, I want thinkers in government. I want educated people who have a sense of "big picture." Of course, I want to win Power Ball, too, and that's more likely.

Yeah, this is why I always found whole "which candidate would you rather have a beer with" thing as ridiculous.

[Mr.B]

Hey Mr. B, in order to try a different tact, what *would* change your mind about gay marriage?

Where've you been? I've said before that if "gays" want to get married, that's their right under the law and it's none of my business....

Lie, again. You opposed SSM being made legal, and it's only been so here for a very few months.

Show me.

[Mr.B]

"[............]"

Good grief Homer; tell us how you really feel....

You read it? The cretin has a one-track, gay-obsessed (hmmm) "mind" and I just moved on to the next page.

Open Forum...you don't like it? Use PM.

Strange how every time you type "gay" or anything to do with "gay", you add that (hmmm) to it.
You daydreaming about something; your lips vibrating, or what? You got it bad.

[Mr.B]

Show me.

Been there, done that. Every time I linked quotes of your advocacy for discrimination after you lied about it you ran away, just as you're running away from having lied about it again at the start of this tangent.

You show us where you ever posted that you supported SSM being made legal.

Again...show me.
To my recollection, I've never stated an opinion one way or the other for SSM; other than what I just replied to Banni.

[O Really]

You can fix it all if you want. Just post, without your usual weaseling, "While I still disapprove of homosexuality, I support their full equality in all law and policy." Do that and all our arguments end, no one cares about your obsessive feelings. I won't hold my breath.

I dunno, man. That's not as easy as you think. I'm trying to say, "while I still disapprove of redneckiness, I support their full equality in all law and policy." I typed it just then with quotes, but when I try to say it, I gag. It just ain't natcheral and I'm pretty sure if I were a religious person I could find some verses condemning redneckiness. Maybe we should just settle for Mr.B admitting that he's as unreasonably prejudiced against homosexuals as I am against rednecks.

[Mr.B]

<sigh>......
Q: "Do you support full legal and institutional equality and opportunity for gays - marriage, employment, housing, schools, etc.?"
A: "If I believe homosexuality is an abnormal sexual union, why should I support marriage that is not Biblically sanctioned? What's the point in a marriage between homosexuals anyway? Otherwise, yes, I support equality in the other scenarios you've mentioned."


Since I said "If I believe homosexuality is an abnormal sexual union, why should I support marriage that is not Biblically sanctioned?",
why are you having so much trouble understanding it? I asked why should I support it.

"Busted lying, again, and stupid enough to think that you wouldn't be busted lying, again."
There's no lie, dubmass. I'm saying this the last time and you can toot your horn all you like after this, I'm through with this childish, immature, back-and-forth bantering.

I'm tired of your "gay"-obsessed, stupidity-laced accusations that are so pointless. Here:

I do not believe homosexuality to be a normal lifestyle. Inasmuch as I am a Christian, the Holy Bible states that God views homosexuality as an abomination, and that is my "cherry-picked" opinion. I do not hate homosexuals; I just do not believe their life choices to be normal; they are entitled to every right that I have. If a man wants to "marry" another man, or a woman another woman, that's their choice. Nothing I can say or do is going to change that; I just happen to disagree with their choices... it's God they have to deal with.

O Really, I am not prejudiced against homosexuals, or rednecks. Again, I disapprove of their lifestyle; and I suppose some of that could be applied to "redneckinesss"...you know, that beer-gut, mullet hair thingy.