The homophobic thread :>

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote:
bannination wrote:
Mr.B wrote:
k9nanny wrote:[........]
Vrede wrote:WELCOME BACK!!! Missed you....
That wasn't nice Banni....
wut?
It was/is again me, and it's exactly as "nice" as the lie( :lol: ) it corrects.

Plus, dishonestly substituting homerfobe for k9nanny is not a very nice thing to do to k9nanny. Apparently, anyone can be a victim of Mr.B's obsession with me.
Yeah...I'm obsessed with you....I can't sleep, eat.....you're constantly in my thoughts....it was intended as a laugh; it had nothing to do with outing k9nanny, or her post; of course you'd rather accuse me of attempting a smear of k9nanny; how typical of you.
The quotes weren't changed; don't get your step-ins in a wad.

(sorry Banni, but you were logged in last night; I thought it was you that changed the post)

It was supposed to be funny, what with you and Homey being such good friends and all...... :shock: :lol:

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote: "Maybe you should put a little thought into the accuracy, origin and even literacy of the things you copy and paste while trying to win homerfobe's approval. Next.
:lol: :lol: "win homerfobe's approval..."! :lol: :lol: I bet you sat up for hours dreaming that one up....good 'un!

You are aware that all that is an old Internet joke, don't you? Boy...y'all really are a thin-skinned lot! Who'd a'thunk you and O Really would get your shorts all twisted out of sorts over a bit of pundit? :lol: :lol: Well, at least, I know what it takes to get you going off the deep end...maybe I should have posted my part of that in the 'Just for Fun' thread.....hey Homey...would you have approved of that? Vrede wants to know. :lol:

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23451
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by O Really »

I don't think responding to a joke with opposing opinion is getting shorts twisted. Personally, I wasn't offended, annoyed, or upset. Truth is, I'm just glad Mr.B recognized it as a joke. Homo probably believes it, as does a writer to the A-CT today (copied below). Once, a long time ago in a galaxy far away, "Conservative Thought" wasn't an oxymoron.

(quote)
Pondering some conundrums of our era

Here are six conundrums of the United States: America is capitalist and greedy — half of the population is subsidized; they think they are victims; their representatives run the government; the poor keep getting poorer; they have things that people in other countries only dream about; they want America to be more like those other countries. If you don’t pay for benefits there is no down-side in being victims and demanding more; see “Atlas Shrugged.”

Consider for a moment: We are advised to not judge all Muslims by actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge all gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics.

Here’s another one worth considering: We constantly hear how Social Security is going to run out of money.

But we never hear about welfare or food stamps running out of money?

What’s interesting is the first group “worked for” their money, the second just enjoy benefits with no contribution.

Finally, why are we cutting benefits for our veterans, no pay raises for our military and cutting our army to a level lower than before World War II, but are increasing payments and benefits to illegal aliens?

Peter A. Gordon, Weaverville

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

O Really wrote: "Truth is, I'm just glad Mr.B recognized it as a joke."
Thanks...apparently you can recognize a joke for what it is and accept it as a joke...
as opposed to some people! :roll:

"Here’s another one worth considering: We constantly hear how Social Security is going to run out of money.
But we never hear about welfare or food stamps running out of money?....What’s interesting is the first group “worked for” their money, the second just enjoy benefits with no contribution."

I think that's a good question....People work all their lives to be able to retire with some semblance of money coming in as opposed to the largest majority of welfare recipients who pop out illegitimate babies and sit around on their duffs waiting for the next welfare check, while our illustrious leaders in Washington ponder ways to cut SS benefits but increase payments to illegals and deadbeats.

"Finally, why are we cutting benefits for our veterans, no pay raises for our military and cutting our army to a level lower than before World War II, but are increasing payments and benefits to illegal aliens?"
Vrede constantly dribbles about "trampling, pissing, etc. on the Constitution"; wonder why Obama thinks he is above the Constitution (and law) by giving illegals amnesty and a free ride to cross our borders without due process?

Peter A. Gordon, Weaverville

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

As I originally posted....then the ship hit the sand and the censoring machine kicked in....
:lol: :lol: :violent:

k9nanny wrote:[........]
Vrede wrote:WELCOME BACK!!! Missed you....
(the honesty machine strikes back)

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23451
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by O Really »

Mr.B wrote:
O Really wrote: "Truth is, I'm just glad Mr.B recognized it as a joke."
Thanks...apparently you can recognize a joke for what it is and accept it as a joke...
as opposed to some people! :roll:

"Here’s another one worth considering: We constantly hear how Social Security is going to run out of money.
But we never hear about welfare or food stamps running out of money?....What’s interesting is the first group “worked for” their money, the second just enjoy benefits with no contribution."

I think that's a good question....People work all their lives to be able to retire with some semblance of money coming in as opposed to the largest majority of welfare recipients who pop out illegitimate babies and sit around on their duffs waiting for the next welfare check, while our illustrious leaders in Washington ponder ways to cut SS benefits but increase payments to illegals and deadbeats.

"Finally, why are we cutting benefits for our veterans, no pay raises for our military and cutting our army to a level lower than before World War II, but are increasing payments and benefits to illegal aliens?"
Vrede constantly dribbles about "trampling, pissing, etc. on the Constitution"; wonder why Obama thinks he is above the Constitution (and law) by giving illegals amnesty and a free ride to cross our borders without due process?

Peter A. Gordon, Weaverville
So, you'll accept a false premise and then expand it, eh? Let's address Social Security and "Welfare." Welfare is in quotes, because there are numerous programs that don't all operate the same way or have the same beneficiaries. Social Security is a defined benefit retirement plan. That means that contributions/benefits are not on a dollar for dollar basis, but future funding is through past/present contributions. The Social Security "going broke" story is way less than accurate. Funding is not low because of benefits, but because the funds have been re-purposed over the years - borrowing from Peter to pay Paul. Repay those, and the fund is stable. It's not going broke, it's just Republicans trying to break it. Welfare programs, on the other hand, are benefits paid out of current funding and are for specific reasons, with time and eligibility limits. While there are some abuses in welfare programs (unlike Wall St. where everyone is honest), I doubt you'd consider the vast majority of those eligible to be "deadbeats." Your characterization of the typical welfare recipient as lazy, shiftless, "welfare Cadillac" type person is totally in conflict with the facts, which are easy to find with minimal effort.

I'd like to know why benefits to veterans are being cut too, but I'm pretty sure it's not related to increased payments and benefits for illegal aliens. In fact, most payments and benefits specifically exclude illegal aliens. Again, not to say that nobody has ever snuck by, but the programs aren't designed to include the illegals.

Maybe you'd like to reconsider on the position that Obama has given illegals illegal amnesty. Hasn't happened. As to the "free ride across the border"? That's called "deportation," which as Vrede and others have pointed out, Obama has done more of than anybody before him.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

O Really wrote: "I'd like to know why benefits to veterans are being cut too...."
So would thousands of other veterans.

Used to be that one could get VA benefits upon completion of his/her military duties; the level of benefits was determined by length of service, type of discharge, and degree of service-related disability. Although I only served a little over 2 years of my enlistment, I applied for and received a certain degree of benefits.

Now I understand that discharged (enlisted) veterans can only receive a maximum of 5 years of VA care unless they were wounded and/or theirs wounds created a lasting disability..... (I don't have the full info on this, nor officer's benefits, and I didn't look it up)...therefore, I'd say that was a cut in VA benefits.

As far as all the other stuff in what I posted, take it with a grain of salt as to each's merits; I didn't author it to begin with and according to Vrede, I was applauding and cheerleading Homerfobe; not to mention trying to win his approval! There's only one here who "actually" has to win the "approval" of other posters Image can't imagine who that would be though. :-0?>

User avatar
Boatrocker
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2066
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Southeast of Disorder

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Boatrocker »

O Really wrote:. . . f you don’t pay for benefits there is no down-side in being victims and demanding more; see “Atlas Shrugged.”

Peter A. Gordon, Weaverville
Reference Ayn Rand and show yourself as an idiot.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Mr.B wrote:As I originally posted....then the ship hit the sand and the censoring machine kicked in....
:lol: :lol: :violent:

k9nanny wrote:[........]
Vrede wrote:WELCOME BACK!!! Missed you....
(the honesty :---P machine strikes back)
I didn't quote k9nanny, ninny.
Why didn't you delete my explanation at the top? What you typed into my quote was not my original post.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote:Welfare's not so easy to get anymore and our biggest welfare programs are the military, Medicare, SSI and the VA. Oh wait, you got/get all of them. On behalf of taxpayers, you're welcome.
Your jealousy of veterans is your loudest whine. Eat your heart out, wuss.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote: Sounds to me like any cuts are because of the lucre you're reaping. Feel free to donate some of it back.
Lucre....! :lol: Right! What I've received in VA benefits in the last 20 years wouldn't fill a cookie jar! It's just there if/when I need it. Eat your jealous heart out.

In your feeble, jealous mind you think I (or any other veteran) make daily visits to the VA. They're lucky to see my face (or hiney) once a year when I go for my required physical. Sorry your wussy existence can't claim some of that filthy "lucre" that you envy so much.....and, you're welcome, you poor little taxpaying victim.

Strange how you blubbering liberals (yes you are) think it's absolutely redundant that veterans receive any post-military benefits, yet you demand that every drug-riddled addict that has the ability to breed be given all sorts of government-sponsored freebies. Next.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

[color=#BF0000]Vrede[/color] wrote:
Mr.B wrote:I didn't quote k9nanny, ninny.
I never said you did, ninny.
How soon you conveniently forgot: "Plus, dishonestly substituting homerfobe for k9nanny is not a very nice thing to do to k9nanny." You didn't say I quoted her; you said, in essence, that I replaced her quote with Homer's. I did no sucha dunnit. All I did was use your reply to k9nanny as a reply to Homer. Again, you poor victim, k9nanny wasn't even involved. I didn't even quote any of Homer's words.... :shock:

Why didn't you delete my explanation at the top?
Because it would be unethical of me to alter your words. This does not apply when I'm merely correcting the context of my own words.
You didn't alter my words, dummy; you changed the wording in the post, which was just as unethical, and you didn't correct any content. I posted, you changed the wording. What you typed into my quote was not my original post.

I figured putting my addition in parentheses and italics would make that clear. Who do you think was confused by it?
Do you think the others here are dummies? you must if you think they've not got sense enough to see that I posted your reply as that being to Homer instead of k9nanny. They've also got sense enough to know that it was done in jest; despite your cry of "dishonesty".. :roll: I'm sure everything would have been alright had the roles been reversed; not that you would ever change wording in a post....noooo, not you!

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by rstrong »

homerfobe wrote:rstrong and Verde, you criticize Mr. B because he's sincere in his religious beliefs
As I've made clear several times, I criticize him because he's NOT sincere in his religious beliefs. He merely cherry-picks the bits of the Bible that back his personal phobias, bigotries and hatreds, and ignores the rest.

For example he pretends that his homophobia is based on a directive in Paul's First Letter to the Corinthians. But other directives in the same letter - like that women should not speak in church - he simply ignores.

There are plenty of Christian denominations that endorse and perform same-sex marriages. It's not that they're any less Christian. At most they've simply cherry-picked more humanely than Mr.B.

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by rstrong »

Vrede wrote:
Mr.B wrote:
homerfobe wrote:How to be a good Democrat ...
... How to be a good Democrat (pt.2)

... You have to believe that Margaret Sanger and Gloria Steinmen are more important to American history than Thomas Jefferson,
General Robert E. Lee or Thomas Edison.

You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial quotas and set-asides aren't. ...

... It's a little soon too nail down the legacy of "Gloria Steinmen (sic)" and she's had tons of equally impactful contemporaries, but Margaret Sanger clearly was more important to American history than General Robert E. Lee. Some other slaver defender would have inevitably lost and Lee, given how good he was, only got lots more Americans killed and further crushed the South's economy.
It's the same for Edison and his light bulb. Before he could "invent" it, he had to buy out the Canadian patent first. Not that the Canadians invented the light bulb - there are many others on record experimenting with them earlier.

His greater success was largely due to a higher vacuum than others were able to achieve - by use of the Sprengel pump, newly invented by others. But that pump was now available to others too.

It's much like how Apple gets credit for the Graphical User Interface (GUI) even though Xerox and others had them earlier. When conditions (price, power and availability of chips needed) suddenly became more favorable, they were in the best position to exploit it. Had Edison not been around, the light bulb would have been commercialized anyway.

User avatar
homerfobe
Ensign
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:37 am
Location: All over more than anywhere else.

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by homerfobe »

The grand fagmaster is confusing the topics now. He's so high and mighty on his queer crusade he can't keep his shit together. Hey stupid, this is the faggot thread. You and your church lady are fighting in the other thread. I know you've missed me even you wouldn't let Mr. B. say so. I'll be in your little town here for a while longer. I'm having too much fun to answer all your idiocy.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by rstrong »

homerfobe wrote:The grand fagmaster is confusing the topics now. He's so high and mighty on his queer crusade he can't keep his shit together.
Thanks for letting us know how you're doing. We were concerned.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote:Majority of Irish voters support legal marriage for LGBT couples – poll
Obsessed

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote: "It's adorable how consistently you fail at trying to turn my words back against me."
It's adorable how "consistently" you whine about being the poor persecuted victim. I only said you were obsessed; we've been over this before because you "consistently" find articles concerning homosexuals to post; then "run shrieking" like a wounded puppy when someone rebuts you. Own it..
Vrede wrote:"Sure are a lot of non-"real Christians" in that 89% Christian country."
Sure enough. They are about as spiritually Christian as you are.

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by rstrong »

Mr.B wrote:It's adorable how "consistently" you whine about being the poor persecuted victim.
Vrede complains when OTHERS are the poor persecuted victims.

Ask a Christian. They'll understand.
Mr.B wrote:
Vrede wrote:"Sure are a lot of non-"real Christians" in that 89% Christian country."
Sure enough. They are about as spiritually Christian as you are.
They're spiritually Christian. Not cherry-picking the bits of the Bible that match YOUR personal hatreds, phobias and bigotries, doesn't change that.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

rstrong wrote: "Vrede complains when OTHERS are the poor persecuted victims. Ask a Christian. They'll understand."
Vrede doesn't complain; when he wants your opinion, he'll give it to you.
Mr.B wrote:
Vrede wrote:"Sure are a lot of non-"real Christians" in that 89% Christian country."
Sure enough. They are about as spiritually Christian as you are.
"They're spiritually Christian."
Not if they support what God has condemned as abomination....you know....that "cherry-picked part?"

"Not cherry-picking the bits of the Bible that match YOUR personal hatreds, phobias and bigotries, doesn't change that."
Those "cherry-picked bits" of the Bible were there long before I ever "cherry-picked" them, and yep, they don't change.
You God-haters just can't stand it, can you?

Personal hatred for who? I've stated my personal disdain for what.... :roll:
According to you God-haters, any disdain for perversion or immorality is bigotry and phobic. Ask me if I care what you think.

Post Reply