Where's Rudy?

[Vrede too]

Rudy Giuliani says he's willing to testify, give 'demonstrations' at Trump impeachment trial

They could wipe out the massive impeached POSPOTUS/Repug deficit by putting it on pay per view.

Of course, he's lying and will never show up. The impeached 45SHOLE Klan knows that both truthful and false testimony will put them in prison.

[1 CAT FAN]

Did the phantom whistle blower show up?
Who knows what those leftist were doing behind those closed doors.

Wait...
Dems conjured up what they wanted leftist media to pass along to their hopeful following.

[Vrede too]

If Rudy spent the night with that woman and he came to "know" her in the Biblical sense, he would never have woke in the morning. Speaking of that, I just finished reading "I Hear You Paint Houses" by Charles Brandt; the book the movie "The Irishman" was made from. Turns out the Mafia damn near decided to kill Rudy back in the 90's but it was narrowly voted down by the Commission. The heads of the crime families are collectively known as the Commission and any big decision must be voted on by them before any action. They almost whacked him back when he was chasing some of them down in NYC.

Ironic that Rudy is now central to a massive corrupt and criminal conspiracy.

[bannination]

Did the phantom whistle blower show up?
Who knows what those leftist were doing behind those closed doors.

Wait...
Dems conjured up what they wanted leftist media to pass along to their hopeful following.

How do you have closed doors when everyone was invited?

[Vrede too]

How do you have closed doors when everyone was invited?

The whistle blower, who was fully endorsed by impeached Dolt .45's own Inspector General of the intelligence community, has become largely irrelevant and is just a desperate straw man being whined about by idiotic Trumpette cowards (redundant I know). Impeached POSPOTUS, Rudy and Mulvaney have already confessed, and the call memo and multiple direct witnesses prove the campaign law felonies and treason. Now:

White House budget official told Pentagon that order to hold Ukraine aid came from Trump, national security site reports

In the face of warnings from the Pentagon that the hold on military aid to Ukraine could be illegal, an official from the Office of Management and Budget made it clear that the order to keep the freeze in place came directly from President Donald Trump, according to unredacted documents reviewed by Just Security.

The documents, including emails from officials at the Department of Defense and the Office of Management and Budget that were released under court order last month but were either partially or completely blacked out, offer new details about tensions between the two agencies tasked with carrying out Trump's unexplained hold on aid to Ukraine.

They also raise serious questions about why the newly revealed contents were redacted by the Trump administration in the first place amid congressional oversight efforts and court orders in Freedom of Information Act litigation.

"These redactions at least raise eyebrows. The categories that the Freedom of Information Act allows the government to withhold are sufficiently vague that it's hard to say whether these redactions were actually in violation of that law," said Josh Geltzer, executive director and visiting professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center's Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection.

"But does it appear suspicious given the damning nature of what was withheld, and the current government's obvious motivation for withholding it," he told CNN.

'Clear direction from POTUS'

Among the documents viewed by Just Security, a website focusing on reporting and analysis of national security law and policy, was an August 30 email from Michael Duffey, associate director of national security programs at OMB to Elaine McCusker, the acting Pentagon comptroller, stating the freeze on aid to Ukraine would continue at the explicit direction of the President despite growing legal concerns within the Pentagon and mounting external questions prompted by news of the hold becoming public just days prior.

"Clear direction from POTUS to continue to hold," Duffey wrote in that email, which has only been made available in redacted form until now and was not handed over to House investigators conducting the impeachment inquiry into the President, according to Just Security.

The August 30 email was sent on the same day Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo met with Trump to discuss the hold, which had already been in place for roughly two months.

Additional emails viewed by Just Security show that McCusker first raised concerns about the legality of the hold on July 25, the same day as Trump's now infamous call with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky in which Trump pressed Zelensky for investigations that could boost him politically.

The Defense Department issued additional warnings to OMB and the White House about the legality of the hold as it stretched into August. Specifically, Pentagon officials made clear they were becoming increasingly concerned about DoD's ability to spend the Ukraine funding by the legally mandated September 30 deadline....

There is nothing that the whistle blower can add to what has now been PROVEN by other means and 1 FAT CAN, a supposed LEO, is a useful idiot in a criminal conspiracy and coverup.

In fact, 1 FAT CAN is so gullible, stupid and enamored with impeached 45SHOLE that s/he fell for:



ANNOUNCING: PolitiFact's 2019 Lie of the Year

[1 CAT FAN]

Did the phantom whistle blower show up?
Who knows what those leftist were doing behind those closed doors.

Wait...
Dems conjured up what they wanted leftist media to pass along to their hopeful following.

How do you have closed doors when everyone was invited?

The Closed-Door Impeachment
The Democrats’ current strategy could undermine their bid to get public opinion firmly on their side.
Except for an initial open hearing, Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee have so far conducted their impeachment investigation entirely behind closed doors. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... nt/600355/

Inside the Closed-Door House Impeachment Meetings
Nearly all of the witnesses in the House impeachment inquiry have testified behind closed doors, drawing attention—including objections—to the process Democrats are using to explore whether to remove President Trump from office.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/inside-the ... 1571423200

Leftist Pelosi had to have time to conjure something from her cauldron.

[bannination]

Did the phantom whistle blower show up?
Who knows what those leftist were doing behind those closed doors.

Wait...
Dems conjured up what they wanted leftist media to pass along to their hopeful following.

How do you have closed doors when everyone was invited?

The Closed-Door Impeachment
The Democrats’ current strategy could undermine their bid to get public opinion firmly on their side.
Except for an initial open hearing, Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee have so far conducted their impeachment investigation entirely behind closed doors. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... nt/600355/

Inside the Closed-Door House Impeachment Meetings
Nearly all of the witnesses in the House impeachment inquiry have testified behind closed doors, drawing attention—including objections—to the process Democrats are using to explore whether to remove President Trump from office.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/inside-the ... 1571423200

Leftist Pelosi had to have time to conjure something from her cauldron.

From your article:

Republicans say witnesses should be testifying in public,

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH

Boy did that change quick.

[1 CAT FAN]

Did the phantom whistle blower show up?
Who knows what those leftist were doing behind those closed doors.

Wait...
Dems conjured up what they wanted leftist media to pass along to their hopeful following.

How do you have closed doors when everyone was invited?

The Closed-Door Impeachment
The Democrats’ current strategy could undermine their bid to get public opinion firmly on their side.
Except for an initial open hearing, Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee have so far conducted their impeachment investigation entirely behind closed doors. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... nt/600355/

Inside the Closed-Door House Impeachment Meetings
Nearly all of the witnesses in the House impeachment inquiry have testified behind closed doors, drawing attention—including objections—to the process Democrats are using to explore whether to remove President Trump from office.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/inside-the ... 1571423200

Leftist Pelosi had to have time to conjure something from her cauldron.

From your article:

Republicans say witnesses should be testifying in public,

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH

Boy did that change quick.

No chance in that happening. Leftist wasting their time.
Vrede will be along shortly.

Leftist Pelosi had to have time to conjure something from her cauldron.

[Vrede too]

They hearings were behind closed doors at first, but something like 45 Repug committee members were also behind those closed doors, something referred to in his own links. 1 FAT CAN is just being a big fat crybaby with: "Who knows what those leftist [sic, just one?] were doing behind those closed doors."

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH

1 FAT CAN is whining about 2 1/2 months ago when there were 2 full sets of PUBLIC hearings since then, the impeached 45SHOLE Klan refuses to testify, AND Moscow Mitch is resisting a real trial with actual witnesses.

Lame and cowardly Repugs have been desperately and stupidly whining on and on about process in order to deflect from discussion of the inquiry’s content - Dolt .45’s (and several others) campaign law felonies and treason. Poor babies. However, screeching about things that were resolved long ago is just pathetic by any standard.

[bannination]

No chance in that happening. Leftist wasting their time.

Well, at least you admit there's no chance of a fair trial.

[1 CAT FAN]

No chance in that happening. Leftist wasting their time.

Well, at least you admit there's no chance of a fair trial.

For Who?

desperately and stupidly whining

Tell the Senate:

[Vrede too]

Well, at least you admit there's no chance of a fair trial.

[1 CAT FAN]

No chance in that happening. Leftist wasting their time.

Well, at least you admit there's no chance of a fair trial.

For Who?

desperately and stupidly whining

Tell the Senate:

Pelosi's cauldron.

[neoplacebo]

I remember when I had a fifth grade conceptual understanding of things; it was when I was in fifth grade.

[neoplacebo]

Well, dammit, it's been about two weeks since Rudy came back from Ukraine with a suitcase full of evidence that he told trump was "more than you could imagine." So where the hell is this fine evidence? I sort of think that if trump had anything he considers good news for him or even just another, but new, batshit crazy conspiracy theory, we'd have been hearing about it nonstop since Rudy got back. I sense there is something not fitting the playbook here. Maybe Rudy just had Ukrainian Jesus in that suitcase and he suffocated and froze to death in the cargo hold of the plane and they're too embarrassed to admit it. So I guess, yeah, that would be more than I could imagine.

[GoCubsGo]

So where is Rudy?

[billy.pilgrim]

So where is Rudy?

I asked the google and this is what I found.

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0547126/

[neoplacebo]

I just figured he's been lying low after getting a particularly vigorous polishing of the skull so that once Rudy the talking skull resumes his role, he will be a little more shiny. Or he could have gotten his fingers caught in an elevator door during one of his constant finger contortions and has been stuck there for two weeks.

[Vrede too]

So where is Rudy?

I asked the google and this is what I found.

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0547126/

... Rudy meets a girl her age and they play together.

Nttawwt.

More seriously, once Biden is cemented as the nominee I expect Rudy and Ukraine to reappear on center stage.

[neoplacebo]

So where is Rudy?

I asked the google and this is what I found.

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0547126/

... Rudy meets a girl her age and they play together.

Nttawwt.

More seriously, once Biden is cemented as the nominee I expect Rudy and Ukraine to reappear on center stage.

Of course. This is where the suitcase full of evidence proving sexual, bestial, and generally foul business vis a vis Hunter Biden and Ukraine election interference will suddenly appear. Rudy the talking skull brought this case back to the US several months ago. The evidence must be mountainous and is still being evaluated.