Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
- bannination
- Captain
- Posts: 5534
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
- Location: Hendersonville
- Contact:
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
Yep, it wasn't about them having control. They wanted a forum where they could censor people and no one be the wiser.
Must have really pissed on their parade at CPF, cause now anyone that looks up CPF can also find out how much they censor.
Must have really pissed on their parade at CPF, cause now anyone that looks up CPF can also find out how much they censor.
- Boatrocker
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
- Location: Southeast of Disorder
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
Bumpbump.
Come on in, wingnuts, the water's fine, and it's free of censorial contaminants!
Come on in, wingnuts, the water's fine, and it's free of censorial contaminants!
I will not lie down.
I will not go quietly.
I will not go quietly.
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 53831
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
I notice the new flag. If historical accuracy matters to you, those Southerners flew this flag more recently and more often:
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 53831
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
"Note: Conservatives abandoned this due to the need to ban everyone they disagree with."
- Leo Lyons
- Ensign
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
Wow. No posts since 2013. Wonder where all the Conservatives went?
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 53831
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
The quote is from the descriptor for this FORUM, NOT "this (thread)" - pay attention! - "2013" is a lie, the words are accurate, and they're banni's, NOT mine. When someone is a lying, crybaby idiot like you, why should they escape being trash-mouthed, and why do you detest personal responsibility? Is that just how career socialist workers are?
@onion13@
Here's the rest of the quote: "Contact the admin if you would like to moderate this forum. The admin is more than willing to change images and theme as you see fit. "
Are you gonna sign up or are you just going to screech at the darkness?
@onion13@
Here's the rest of the quote: "Contact the admin if you would like to moderate this forum. The admin is more than willing to change images and theme as you see fit. "
Are you gonna sign up or are you just going to screech at the darkness?
- neoplacebo
- Admiral of the Fleet
- Posts: 12048
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
- Location: Kingsport TN
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
I'll take "what the fuck am I going to do with this?" for 600......no, wait; I think I'll spin.
- Leo Lyons
- Ensign
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
Vrede too wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:46 pm The quote is from the descriptor for this FORUM, NOT "this (thread)" - pay attention!
Oh. Excuse hell out of me.
"2013" is a lie, the words are accurate, and they're banni's, NOT mine
You silly-assed dipsquibble! You have no clue wtf you're talking about! I wasn't referring to anyone's words in particular, just the gap in the dates, doofwad! here, let me help:
When someone is a lying, crybaby idiot like you, why should they escape being trash-mouthed, and why do you detest personal responsibility?Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
by Boatrocker » Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:49 am
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
by Vrede too » Sun Jan 06, 2019 6:45 am
Is that just how career socialist workers are?
Just can't get through a post without calling names and getting pissed 'cause you thought you were being personally attacked.
Verified traits of a sociopath. Get help.
I wouldn't know how "career socialist workers are"; I do know I HAD a career, unlike a certain sociopath who traipsed all over the country spewing opinionated hatred at others.
Here's the rest of the quote: "Contact the admin if you would like to moderate this forum. The admin is more than willing to change images and theme as you see fit." Are you gonna sign up or are you just going to screech at the darkness?
Nah, Banni's got you, he don't need me whining too.
neoplacebo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:59 pm I'll take "what the fuck am I going to do with this?" for 600......no, wait; I think I'll spin.
Sounds like the joke where the farmer told the salesman he could sleep in the barn with the farmer's son:
Salesman: Shit, I'm in the wrong joke. . .
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 53831
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
Dang, you sure are a screw up!
Your idiotic confusing of this THREAD for the Conservative Forum is YOUR problem, and doesn't merit sarcastic whining about my having noticed.
This is CLEARLY an introduction to the Conservative Forum thread. OF COURSE posts did not continue in THIS thread long past the introduction. It's adorable that even the simplest concepts escape you.
You're cowering from my first question, wuss.
Why are you ALWAYS so sackless when you flub?
Yes, you WERE "referring to anyone's words in particular", liar. You "Corrected" them.
You're now cowering from that CLEAR reference to me. That's pitiful, wuss. Oh, I forgot to mention that your Dr. Phil impersonation is moronic, and that your "traits of a sociopath" don't apply to me. For example, you are the serial liar, as I've often identified, yet you've never found a supposed lie of mine. Your projection is wussy, "sociopath".
The first "calling names" was yours, crybaby. There's is nothing, nothing more pitiful than a poster that dishes it out then whines like a toddler if it's returned.
"traipsed all over the country"??? I've been licensed in exactly 3 states - my home state, the more urban one I went to in order to advance in my profession more rapidly, and the one where my elderly, sick and then dying mother had retired in. Not my problem that I'm employable anywhere while you were so incompetent that you were too frightened to leave your one America-wrecking prohibitionist job because your socialist bosses made it impossible to get fired from it.
I'm not a moderator in this forum or any other, despite your whining about my moving posts around and deleting several days of them. I KNEW that you would refuse to 'light a candle', slacker.
Again, I have no problem debating cons, but your incessant and obsessive illiteracy, stupidity, immaturity, lying, whining and cowardice make it pointless, and are more pathetic than entertaining. So, the floor is yours to throw your usual foot-stomping tantrum on. I'm not bothering to open any more of your posts here.
Your idiotic confusing of this THREAD for the Conservative Forum is YOUR problem, and doesn't merit sarcastic whining about my having noticed.
This is CLEARLY an introduction to the Conservative Forum thread. OF COURSE posts did not continue in THIS thread long past the introduction. It's adorable that even the simplest concepts escape you.
You're cowering from my first question, wuss.
Why are you ALWAYS so sackless when you flub?
Yes, you WERE "referring to anyone's words in particular", liar. You "Corrected" them.
You're now cowering from that CLEAR reference to me. That's pitiful, wuss. Oh, I forgot to mention that your Dr. Phil impersonation is moronic, and that your "traits of a sociopath" don't apply to me. For example, you are the serial liar, as I've often identified, yet you've never found a supposed lie of mine. Your projection is wussy, "sociopath".
The first "calling names" was yours, crybaby. There's is nothing, nothing more pitiful than a poster that dishes it out then whines like a toddler if it's returned.
"traipsed all over the country"??? I've been licensed in exactly 3 states - my home state, the more urban one I went to in order to advance in my profession more rapidly, and the one where my elderly, sick and then dying mother had retired in. Not my problem that I'm employable anywhere while you were so incompetent that you were too frightened to leave your one America-wrecking prohibitionist job because your socialist bosses made it impossible to get fired from it.
I'm not a moderator in this forum or any other, despite your whining about my moving posts around and deleting several days of them. I KNEW that you would refuse to 'light a candle', slacker.
Again, I have no problem debating cons, but your incessant and obsessive illiteracy, stupidity, immaturity, lying, whining and cowardice make it pointless, and are more pathetic than entertaining. So, the floor is yours to throw your usual foot-stomping tantrum on. I'm not bothering to open any more of your posts here.
- neoplacebo
- Admiral of the Fleet
- Posts: 12048
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
- Location: Kingsport TN
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
Ok, I'll swing after all these years. I'm the type of conservative that just fucking hates government interference in business or industrial or financial matters but I'm all right with it when it comes to what you do in your bedroom or what you look like or whether women get to control their childbirth choices or not. I don't mind that I'm against organized labor and quality public education and adequate health care for all citizens....what keeps me up at night is the senseless government regulations on heavy metal emissions from industrial PRODUCTION and the stupid regulations on emissions into waterways.....not to mention all the government land out west that's not available for DEVELOPMENT. it pisses me off. I conveniently forget to realize that the entire western US would still be a fucking desert if it weren't for uh, government intervention, and, uh, that the reason a lot of that land out west is owned by the government is that they don't want to finance another bunch of assholes like me in developing it. But I'm still against them; the government, that is. What these morons don't realize is that we're winning in that we've been stealthily starving the government of money for the past forty years.....and we're not done. No sir, you bet'cha.Boatrocker wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:49 am Bumpbump.
Come on in, wingnuts, the water's fine, and it's free of censorial contaminants!
- bannination
- Captain
- Posts: 5534
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
- Location: Hendersonville
- Contact:
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
That's just stupid, too many options available to ignore one person. They could have banned said person, or ignored said person.
They need *complete* censorship - as in can't post anywhere at any time.
:teasing-neener:
- Leo Lyons
- Ensign
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
Vrede too wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:27 pm Dang, you sure are a screw up!
Thanks. That's the nicest thing you've said since my return to the forum.
Your idiotic confusing of this THREAD for the Conservative Forum is YOUR problem, and doesn't merit sarcastic whining about my having noticed.
Semantics. Thread, forum, you knew what I was talking about. Mountains and molehills come to mind. (Sociopathic trait)
This is CLEARLY an introduction to the Conservative Forum thread. OF COURSE posts did not continue in THIS thread long past the introduction. It's adorable that even the simplest concepts escape you.
They escaped you as well. You had no clue I meant the last post was by Boatrocker in 2013, yours in 2019.
You're cowering from my first question, wuss. Why are you ALWAYS so sackless when you flub?
I give up; to boost your ego? (Sociopathic trait)
Yes, you WERE "referring to anyone's words in particular", liar. You "Corrected" them. You're now cowering from that CLEAR reference to me. That's pitiful, wuss.
Poor dumbass. I was referring to dates of the posts. Betcha though I was "attacking" you? (Sociopathic trait)
Oh, I forgot to mention that your Dr. Phil impersonation is moronic, and that your "traits of a sociopath" don't apply to me.
Self-denial much? (Sociopathic trait) Nobody can impersonate Dr.Phil; he's a piece of work from a now-broken mold. It's ironic though that you're so well familiar with him. (I'll send him an email and tell him his "therapy" session with you was for nought.)
For example, you are the serial liar, as I've often identified, yet you've never found a supposed lie of mine.Your projection is wussy, "sociopath".
Umm .. although lying is a sociopathic trait, I don't recall accusing you of lying; I could be wrong though.
The first "calling names" was yours, crybaby. There's is nothing, nothing more pitiful than a poster that dishes it out then whines like a toddler if it's returned.Re: Big Brother is Watching You
Post by Vrede too » Wed Jul 11, 2018 9:26 am
"It looks like you returned primarily to whine about me, and it was your very first post upon coming back. If that's the case, putting you on 'ignore' is uber easy. I have no interest in your childishness." --- (Sociopathic trait)
"traipsed all over the country"??? I've been licensed in exactly 3 states - my home state, the more urban one I went to in order to advance in my profession more rapidly, and the one where my elderly, sick and then dying mother had retired in. Not my problem that I'm employable anywhere while you were so incompetent that you were too frightened to leave your one America-wrecking prohibitionist job because your socialist bosses made it impossible to get fired from it.
Sorry about your Mom. (really) I wasn't talking about your employment; I was referring to your protesting and picketing you've bragged about. Seems I recall your once picketing a missile site or something in the midwest? I didn't have to be employable anywhere and nobody made it impossible for me to leave. In fact, people like you seeking nose candy kept me in (a damn good paying) job. (Retirement benefits are great
too, thank you very much!)
I'm not a moderator in this forum or any other, despite your whining about my moving posts around and deleting several days of them. I KNEW that you would refuse to 'light a candle', slacker.
More sociopathic denial. You yourself have questioned strange circumstances regarding your posts; not an issue anymore; it's just something for you to continue to harp about. Have fun.
Again, I have no problem debating cons, but your incessant and obsessive illiteracy, stupidity, immaturity, lying, whining and cowardice make it pointless, and are more pathetic than entertaining. So, the floor is yours to throw your usual foot-stomping tantrum on.
Ahh, the name-calling begins again. So sociopathic of you; your traits are becoming of you. Thank you ever so much for the opportunity to express my gratitude for our providing entertainment to our fellow members. If it weren't for you, we'd have nothing to laugh about.
I'm not bothering to open any more of your posts here.
Your loss. You done said that before Play another stanza of that song.
- billy.pilgrim
- Admiral
- Posts: 15632
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:44 pm
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
Leo, why do you think that people who support drug law changes do drugs?
I smoked a lot of pot, but that was 40 years ago. I ate a bunch of mushrooms at the same time.
I grew my own pot and harvested the local psilocybin mushrooms. Although I did occasionally try other drugs, I was never really interested in eating things on questionable origin. There were some "study aid" drugs similar to what we give the military today.
To this day, I have never willingly tasted a McDonald's product (I actually did have part of a burger once when my 4 year old was tricked by the local franchise to take Dad for a free Father's Day meal). I'm pretty sure that Nutella and McWhatevers have killed many more people than pot.
Mostly I learned that the drug laws are far worse than the drugs and that the most dangerous drugs were easy to get from doctors.
I smoked a lot of pot, but that was 40 years ago. I ate a bunch of mushrooms at the same time.
I grew my own pot and harvested the local psilocybin mushrooms. Although I did occasionally try other drugs, I was never really interested in eating things on questionable origin. There were some "study aid" drugs similar to what we give the military today.
To this day, I have never willingly tasted a McDonald's product (I actually did have part of a burger once when my 4 year old was tricked by the local franchise to take Dad for a free Father's Day meal). I'm pretty sure that Nutella and McWhatevers have killed many more people than pot.
Mostly I learned that the drug laws are far worse than the drugs and that the most dangerous drugs were easy to get from doctors.
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”
- Leo Lyons
- Ensign
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
I can think of numerous replies to give to that question, but the one answer that strikes me best deals with how drugs affect users; it starts with euphoric effects of relaxation and an escape from their personal problems, eventually leading to the habitual need for it's effects. Looking for a longer-lasting or more intense effect, the user gradually increases their intake which leads to addiction. People in stressful jobs use drugs to "help them cope".billy.pilgrim wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:50 pm Leo, why do you think that people who support drug law changes do drugs?
Some can handle their habits better than others; many can't, which leads to crime. Early traveling "snake doctors" peddled opium-laced wonder drugs openly and without any controls. Law enforcement then became necessary when it was discovered that people using drugs were willing to kill to get more; while those who decry any sort of law enforcement feel that what one does with his own body is his business, and nobody should have the right to exercise any kind of control over the population.
Changing drug laws is not going to change habitual use. Like alcohol and tobacco, it only puts it sale under control of governmental entities like alcohol and tobacco; you got the money, they got the product. Drugs are more addictive than alcohol and tobacco; it's effects on the body and mind is more demanding and cruel than alcohol and tobacco, therefore, no matter who has control of it's sale, it's effects are the same; it knows no sympathy on anyone, it is nobody's friend, and it's seller is even less sympathetic.
I'm certain our resident medical ex-spurt will debunk this and pick out a few choice syllables to hurl my way, but you asked me in a decent manner, and this is my answer; I've dealt with this evil all my "profitable" career; I hate illegal drugs, it's source, it's suppliers, and mostly it's resulting effects on those who use.
- billy.pilgrim
- Admiral
- Posts: 15632
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:44 pm
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
Pretty much a swing and a miss leo. You may want to reread the question.
Let's try this. What do you think about the military pumping up their door kicking killing machines with amphetamines before nightly excursions to tame the locals?
Let's try this. What do you think about the military pumping up their door kicking killing machines with amphetamines before nightly excursions to tame the locals?
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”
- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 22157
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
No point in reading the play list if you only know one song.billy.pilgrim wrote: ↑Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:29 pm Pretty much a swing and a miss leo. You may want to reread the question.
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 53831
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
O Really wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:19 amNo point in reading the play list if you only know one song.billy.pilgrim wrote: ↑Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:29 pmPretty much a swing and a miss leo. You may want to reread the question.
Steppenwolf - The Pusher
- Leo Lyons
- Ensign
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
I'm not going to get entangled in a conversation fueled by hatred and speculation. Sorry.billy.pilgrim wrote: ↑Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:29 pm Pretty much a swing and a miss leo. You may want to reread the question.
Let's try this. What do you think about the military pumping up their door kicking killing machines with amphetamines before nightly excursions to tame the locals?
-
- Red Shirt
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:47 am
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
Leo Lyons wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 6:11 pmI'm not going to get entangled in a conversation fueled by hatred and speculation. Sorry.billy.pilgrim wrote: ↑Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:29 pm Pretty much a swing and a miss leo. You may want to reread the question.
Let's try this. What do you think about the military pumping up their door kicking killing machines with amphetamines before nightly excursions to tame the locals?
Billy posts at LNF as atreyu. All he posts is speculation and hatred of cons and religion.
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 53831
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Go nuts cons! Have your "reasonable" discussions here!
Nttawwt.
Welcome back, your last post was Mar 25, 2013.