End of Roe - the fight continues

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12048
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by neoplacebo »

Vrede too wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:30 pm
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jul 17, 2022 12:36 pm
Jesus.

The laws of unintended consequences rears it's ugly head.

Are the wingnuts happy now?
From your lips . . .

Could federal lands be a loophole for abortion access? Legal experts say it's complicated

:think: Crafty idea. I wonder if it'll fly or if the issues just make it too complex to try.
Smokey says..."only you can prevent pregnancies"
They could probably set up abortion services on Indian reservations, too. They're sovereign entities that have their own laws and courts.....

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 53834
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by Vrede too »

neoplacebo wrote:
Thu Jul 21, 2022 6:36 am
They could probably set up abortion services on Indian reservations, too. They're sovereign entities that have their own laws and courts.....
:thumbup: That wouldn't even require federal involvement, though I'm not sure what current IHS policy is. I believe some tribes are considering it. However, it would be a big step going to war with the misogynist states in which they reside. The potential revenue may be an important factor. In "hater-locked" states like OK it could be huge.

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12048
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by neoplacebo »

Vrede too wrote:
Thu Jul 21, 2022 7:50 am
neoplacebo wrote:
Thu Jul 21, 2022 6:36 am
They could probably set up abortion services on Indian reservations, too. They're sovereign entities that have their own laws and courts.....
:thumbup: That wouldn't even require federal involvement, though I'm not sure what current IHS policy is. I believe some tribes are considering it. However, it would be a big step going to war with the misogynist states in which they reside. The potential revenue may be an important factor. In "hater-locked" states like OK it could be huge.
Opps! Maybe Indian reservations aren't what they used to be. Supreme Court strikes again.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/latest-term- ... 16783.html

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 53834
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by Vrede too »

neoplacebo wrote:
Fri Jul 22, 2022 7:25 am
Vrede too wrote:
Thu Jul 21, 2022 7:50 am
neoplacebo wrote:
Thu Jul 21, 2022 6:36 am
They could probably set up abortion services on Indian reservations, too. They're sovereign entities that have their own laws and courts.....
:thumbup: That wouldn't even require federal involvement, though I'm not sure what current IHS policy is. I believe some tribes are considering it. However, it would be a big step going to war with the misogynist states in which they reside. The potential revenue may be an important factor. In "hater-locked" states like OK it could be huge.
Opps! Maybe Indian reservations aren't what they used to be. Supreme Court strikes again.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/latest-term- ... 16783.html
Not clear how that would affect abortion on the reservations, but it might not be good for women and providers. We'll see. We know the misogynists will seize every advantage they can.

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12048
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by neoplacebo »

Vrede too wrote:
Fri Jul 22, 2022 7:53 am
neoplacebo wrote:
Fri Jul 22, 2022 7:25 am
Vrede too wrote:
Thu Jul 21, 2022 7:50 am
neoplacebo wrote:
Thu Jul 21, 2022 6:36 am
They could probably set up abortion services on Indian reservations, too. They're sovereign entities that have their own laws and courts.....
:thumbup: That wouldn't even require federal involvement, though I'm not sure what current IHS policy is. I believe some tribes are considering it. However, it would be a big step going to war with the misogynist states in which they reside. The potential revenue may be an important factor. In "hater-locked" states like OK it could be huge.
Opps! Maybe Indian reservations aren't what they used to be. Supreme Court strikes again.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/latest-term- ... 16783.html
Not clear how that would affect abortion on the reservations, but it might not be good for women and providers. We'll see. We know the misogynists will seize every advantage they can.
I just see it as chipping away at the long time autonomy of Indian reservations. I didn't even know that murder on a reservation is prosecuted in federal court until I read it in the article. I always thought they were completely autonomous.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 22159
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by O Really »

Surely the US would not violate honour any agreement, contracts, or treaties made with any indigenous tribes. Has it not always ever been honourable and trustworthy in all any Indian affairs?

Oh wait...fixed it. Must have been dreaming.

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12048
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by neoplacebo »

O Really wrote:
Fri Jul 22, 2022 10:50 am
Surely the US would not violate honour any agreement, contracts, or treaties made with any indigenous tribes. Has it not always ever been honourable and trustworthy in all any Indian affairs?

Oh wait...fixed it. Must have been dreaming.
It was the US Army's original "peace with honor" show. They killed just about everybody, claimed peace and victory, and went home. Papers that meant not much were signed by stragglers and throwbacks.

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 53834
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by Vrede too »

neoplacebo wrote:
Fri Jul 22, 2022 4:29 pm
O Really wrote:
Fri Jul 22, 2022 10:50 am
Surely the US would not violate honour any agreement, contracts, or treaties made with any indigenous tribes. Has it not always ever been honourable and trustworthy in all any Indian affairs?

Oh wait...fixed it. Must have been dreaming.
It was the US Army's original "peace with honor" show. They killed just about everybody, claimed peace and victory, and went home. Papers that meant not much were signed by stragglers and throwbacks.
Chattanooga:

'They're Just Going to Let Me Die?' One Woman's Abortion Odyssey

:cry: :angry-cussing:

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 53834
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by Vrede too »

Kansas rejects weakening of abortion rights in ballot initiative

"... the no vote was winning by more than 20 points."

Haha, democracy-hating RW misogynists, you can:
Have Moscow Mitch's create an illegitimate SCOTUS;
Have TRE45ON stack SCOTUS with 3 chronic liars;
See SCOTUS issue an extreme, activist ruling that's bad for America;
Attempt to remove Kansans' rights;
Schedule a vote for the primary because turnout is lower and more con;

But when even Kansas voters get to decide, your sleazy machinations flop.
:---P

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 53834
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by Vrede too »

Georgia Abortion Law Says a Fetus Is Tax Deductible

Georgia’s abortion ban counts a fetus as a person. And now, so does its tax code.

The state’s Department of Revenue announced this week that “any unborn child with a detectable human heartbeat” can be claimed as dependent, providing a $3,000 tax exemption for each pregnancy within a household, months before the child is born. Georgia’s law bans most abortions after six weeks, which is usually around when doctors can begin to detect fetal cardiac activity.

The announcement marks a new frontier of anti-abortion policymaking in a post-Roe America, where conservative lawmakers have moved beyond banning abortion and are now trying to expand the legal rights and protections afforded to a fetus under “fetal personhood” laws. Georgia, Alabama and Arizona have passed abortion bans that include language broadly defining a fetus as a person....
So by this same logic--can someone in Georgia who is 20 years, 5 months old now legally drink alcohol? After all, their heartbeat was detectable more than 21 years prior.

What about voting? If election day is more than 17 years, 5 months after you were born, can you vote?
Vrede too wrote:Good point. Will it really be underage porn if she's 17 years and 5 months old?
:o :wave:

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 22159
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by O Really »

So if you take a tax deduction for a fetus, and then subsequently have a miscarriage, do you have to give the tax break back? If the tax return was for, say 2022 but the fetus didn't miscarry until into 2023, then I suppose it wouldn't be any different from any other dependent who died. But suppose you get pregnant in March, 2022 and miscarry in September. Do you pro-rate the deduction? And what date do you put on a birth certificate? There have already been a lot of unintended consequences from the abortion bans - this crap just wanders off into looney bin territory.

Sometime Lefty
Flight Lieutenant
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:09 am

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by Sometime Lefty »

IRS says a baby born alive on Jan 1 and dies on Jan 1 parents still get the exemption for the year. So a fetus that attains heartbeat then misscarries ... But it is jawja.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 22159
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by O Really »

Sometime Lefty wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 1:38 pm
IRS says a baby born alive on Jan 1 and dies on Jan 1 parents still get the exemption for the year. So a fetus that attains heartbeat then misscarries ... But it is jawja.
Hey, Lefty - welcome back. Thanks, I didn't know that. But jawja is still screwing their own pooch since they're proposing to cover fetuses not born alive.

User avatar
billy.pilgrim
Admiral
Posts: 15632
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:44 pm

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by billy.pilgrim »

Sometime Lefty wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 1:38 pm
IRS says a baby born alive on Jan 1 and dies on Jan 1 parents still get the exemption for the year. So a fetus that attains heartbeat then misscarries ... But it is jawja.
You do realize that Sometimes Lefties from 2012 are now considered to be full blown stinking liberals?
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 53834
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by Vrede too »

O Really wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 12:57 pm
So if you take a tax deduction for a fetus, and then subsequently have a miscarriage, do you have to give the tax break back? If the tax return was for, say 2022 but the fetus didn't miscarry until into 2023, then I suppose it wouldn't be any different from any other dependent who died. But suppose you get pregnant in March, 2022 and miscarry in September. Do you pro-rate the deduction? And what date do you put on a birth certificate? There have already been a lot of unintended consequences from the abortion bans - this crap just wanders off into looney bin territory.
I assume they have some way of verifying pregnancies - MD note, ultrasound, etc. So, let's leave fake pregnancies aside. Still, what's to stop a woman from claiming a deduction at 6 weeks and one day, then going to another state and getting an abortion? She could do this once a year, or even more often if the law allows. :crazy:
Sometime Lefty wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 1:38 pm
IRS says a baby born alive on Jan 1 and dies on Jan 1 parents still get the exemption for the year. So a fetus that attains heartbeat then miscarries ... But it is jawja.
Ditto, good to read you.
O Really wrote:
Fri Aug 05, 2022 1:47 pm
Hey, Lefty - welcome back. Thanks, I didn't know that. But jawja is still screwing their own pooch since they're proposing to cover fetuses not born alive.
That kinda makes sense. The hateful misogynists care a lot more about fetuses than they do living kids.


User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 19267
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

There's nothing they won't spin :lol:

Saw a report yesterday that the unemployment number "missed the forecast ".
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/careers ... r-AA10mbJr
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 53834
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by Vrede too »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Sat Aug 06, 2022 11:49 am
There's nothing they won't spin :lol:

Saw a report yesterday that the unemployment number "missed the forecast ".
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/careers ... r-AA10mbJr
Even though the feds missed by less than Faux Noise. :lol:

A challenge for antiabortion states: Doctors reluctant to work there

... But amid a national shortage of reproductive health practitioners, the early evidence indicates that red states have, at minimum, put themselves at a disadvantage in the competition for crucial front-line providers, experts said....

In another example, a physician contacted by phone by an AMN Healthcare recruiter trying to fill a post in an antiabortion state "simply said, 'Roe versus Wade,' and hung up," Florence said.

Florence said the shift has especially serious implications for small, rural hospitals, which can afford just a small number of maternal specialists or, in some cases, only one....
Often the counties most likely to vote GQP, unless it's a Black ag county.

RepuQ hatred for women is made manifest in more ways than just the obvious. Shame on them.

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 53834
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by Vrede too »

Vrede too wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 11:21 pm
Kansas rejects weakening of abortion rights in ballot initiative

"... the no vote was winning by more than 20 points."

Haha, democracy-hating RW misogynists, you can:
Have Moscow Mitch's create an illegitimate SCOTUS;
Have TRE45ON stack SCOTUS with 3 chronic liars;
See SCOTUS issue an extreme, activist ruling that's bad for America;
Attempt to remove Kansans' rights;
Schedule a vote for the primary because turnout is lower and more con;

But when even Kansas voters get to decide, your sleazy machinations flop.
:---P
Ballot Measures

Abortion
California: Proposition 1 - Guarantee constitutional right to abortion
Projected Winner Yes :clap:
Yes 65.0%
No 35.0%
Est. vote in: 47%

Kentucky: Amendment 2 - No constitutional right to abortion
Projected Winner No :clap: :clap: :clap:
No 52.5%
Yes 47.5%
Est. vote in: 96%
Kentucky! FU Moscow Mitch and Rand.

Michigan: Proposal 3 - Guarantee constitutional right to abortion
Projected Winner Yes :thumbup:
Yes 56.6%
No 43.4%
Est. vote in: 97%
And Gov Whitmer was reelected. :clap:
Montana: Legislative Referendum 131 - Requires medical care for infants born alive

This measure would adopt the “Born-Alive Infant Protection Act,” which provides that infants born alive, including infants born alive after an abortion, are legal persons and requires health care providers to take necessary actions to preserve the life of a born-alive infant. A “YES” vote supports adopting the act. A “NO” vote opposes the act.
No 52.4%
Yes 47.6%
Est. vote in: 86%
Vermont: Proposal 5 - Guarantee constitutional right to abortion
Projected Winner Yes :clap:
Yes 76.0%
No 24.0%
Est. vote in: 72%
Huge.

With Kansas that's:
Freedom 5
Fascism 0
Montana not called, but Freedom leading.
:happy-cheerleaderkid:

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 53834
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: End of Roe - the fight continues

Unread post by Vrede too »

Montana: Legislative Referendum 131 - Requires medical care for infants born alive
Projected Winner (CNN) No :clap: :clap: :clap:
No 52.2%
Yes 47.8%
Est. vote in: 89%

With Kansas that's:
Freedom 6
Fascism 0
:happy-cheerleaderkid: :happy-cheerleaderkid: :happy-cheerleaderkid: :happy-cheerleaderkid: :happy-cheerleaderkid: :happy-cheerleaderkid:

Gotta think the issue had a big impact on other races, too.

Post Reply